Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman -- and now defendant -- Ma Ying-jeou (
What is most unacceptable, however, has not been the way he has behaved as an indicted man. Rather, it is the inconsistent manner in which he has reacted to legal and political developments, which sets a poor example.
On the eve of the trial, Ma said during TV interviews that "some people are trying to purge [him] through the courts." He also said that he would run for the presidency even if a court found him guilty, as he would only be barred from running under Taiwanese law until the appeal process had been exhausted. Such words lay bare his contempt for the judiciary.
Perhaps he has already forgotten that he praised that very same judicial system when first lady Wu Shu-jen (
As it became clear that Ma could be indicted on charges of corruption -- a development which could impact the KMT's chances of winning the presidency next year -- Ma's supporters in the KMT started planning to amend the party charter to remove the anti-corruption clause that, if retained, would result in Ma's suspension from the party.
While KMT Spokesman Su Jun-pin (
As it turns out, on the day Ma was indicted, he announced at a press conference that he intended to seek the presidency, whereupon the KMT eliminated the aforementioned obstacle to his campaign by amending the clause. The KMT could even go one step further and amend another by-law which stipulates that members found guilty of a crime in a court of law cannot be nominated as the party's presidential candidate.
Ma's problem is that he oversimplifies the complexity of domestic politics. When, last year, former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (
Ma is a man who sees himself as having higher moral standards than the rest of us. He is prone to preaching and quick to criticize others for not being as virtuous as he. Little did he know that one day he would be indicted on corruption charges and the impeccable moral standards he expects of others would be applied to himself.
In the end, exposed for what he is, he is left with little choice but to surrender his mock halo of sanctity and resort to political scheming and populist rhetoric to protect himself. The discrepancy between his former image and the one that has emerged could not be more lurid.
Mr Consistent certainly does not practice what he preaches.
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
There are few areas where Beijing, Taipei, and Washington find themselves in agreement these days, but one of them is that the situation in the Taiwan Strait is growing more dangerous. Such a shared assessment quickly breaks down, though, when the question turns to identifying sources of rising tensions. Several Chinese experts and officials I have consulted with recently have argued that Beijing’s increasingly belligerent behavior in the Taiwan Strait is driven mostly by fear. According to this narrative, Beijing is worried that unless it puts a brake on Taiwan’s move away from the mainland, Taiwan could be “lost” forever. They
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) this week came under fire over his speech at a Rotary Club meeting in Taipei on Monday, when he said that Beijing’s military strategy toward Taiwan was “to let the first battle be the last.” If China started a cross-strait war, it would end quickly, without time for other nations to react, he said in his “Cross-Strait Relations and Taiwan Security” address, criticizing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for saying that she hoped other nations would come to Taiwan’s aid in Beijing’s first wave of attacks. A president should prevent war from happening, not talk about how