As expected, the central bank on Thursday raised its benchmark interest rates 0.125 percentage points, its 11th straight quarterly increase. The bank offered a mild economic outlook and a gentle touch on rising housing prices, but it also hinted that inflation would remain a predominant concern.
Judging from the bank's renewed warnings on inflation, central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (
The bank appeared unconcerned that the latest hike would pour cold water on the nation's already chilled investment sentiment. Instead, the bank could once again raise its rates at its next policy meeting in June if inflationary pressure -- such as oil prices staying at high levels and real estate prices continuing to increase -- persists.
Perng said on Thursday that interest rates, following the latest adjustment, were getting much closer to the "neutral" level and had not peaked yet. He first began using the term "neutral" in September 2004 when the bank kicked off a series of rate hikes to steer the negative real interest rate back to a rather comfortable level in hopes of neither provoking inflation nor jeopardizing economic growth.
Since then, the bank has ratcheted up its benchmark interest rate by a cumulated 1.5 percent and brought its rediscount rate charged to commercial lenders to a five-year high of 2.875 percent.
Unfortunately, the bank's rate hike effect on money supply has been shrinking and its attempt to push money market rates upwards has been negligible as mid and long-term rates in the market have not followed the bank's two-and-a-half years of tightening measures.
Several commercial lenders announced over the weekend they would only increase short-term interest rates on time deposits and time saving deposits 0.03 percentage points, beginning today. By doing so, they were once again signaling to the market that the prevailing funding conditions are flush with funds but no outlets to lend the money under a slow private investment environment.
No wonder the central bank said on Thursday it would auction long-term negotiable certificates of deposit on a regular basis to help absorb such surplus capital in the market.
As the key interest rate is still one of the lowest in Asia outside Japan -- even after the latest rate increase -- it will continue to weigh on the value of the currency. By maintaining a weak NT dollar, the central bank seems to believe it will continue contributing to export growth and maintain sustainable growth.
The bank's basic stance is that as long as the inflation is under control and the economy is on a stable expansion track, its effort to fine-tune its monetary policy through gradual rate hikes will help sustain this growth.
The problem with this approach, however, is that if the NT remains one of the region's underperformers, investors who used to borrow the local currency at a low interest rate to invest in higher-yielding assets elsewhere will continue to do so in future.
The soft pace of private investment is likely to weigh on an economy that otherwise demands that the government improve the investment environment and increase public expenditure, not just the central bank's monetary policy. Commercial lenders' hesitance to increase mid and long-term rates suggests that inflation is what the central bank can best deal with, while problems of weakening growth momentum are beyond its power to influence.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US