The incidents of March 15 and March 20, in which police officers were attacked by the suspects they were investigating, occurred under different circumstances.
One took place while highway patrolmen were performing a traffic safety stop, while the other involved local police trying to capture a suspected narcotics criminal.
These two cases share one lamentable thing in common, however: in both incidents, the suspects steal an officer's gun and shot an innocent passing motorist or one of the arresting officers.
These two incidents underscore the fact that there are several areas where the nation's police training needs to be improved.
However, it also shows a need for an official police protocol for interacting with citizens similar to what can be found in the US.
Almost all drivers in the US know that for their personal safety, when a police officer turns on his vehicle's lights and sirens, they must pull over and turn off their engine.
They know to remain seated in the car with both hands on the steering wheel and wait for further instructions from the police officer.
At this point, the officer's job is just to assess the situation. He can use a computer in his vehicle to look up information about the car and driver and report back to the command center.
If there are safety concerns, he will wait for backup to arrive before getting out of his vehicle. He will cautiously take the driver's license and then proceed as the situation requires.
These customs were developed in response to the high rates of gun ownership in the US.
The Second Amendment of the US Constitution has been interpreted as guaranteeing the rights of citizens to own guns, so while doing their job, police officers are aware they might encounter individuals bearing firearms.
Police officers in the US also frequently work alone, so they emphasize calling for assistance to give the police force an advantage over the suspect before taking action.
The US Supreme Court has ruled that police officers must first consider their personal safety and that of innocent bystanders.
The nation's style of police enforcement is very similar to that found in the US. For example, in the highway shooting case, the two officers discovered a speeding black Mitsubishi sedan while on patrol and immediately turned on their lights and sirens.
However, the car sped off instead of stopping for inspection. As a result, the officers requested backup and began what in the US would sometimes be described as a typical case of "hot pursuit."
The difference, however, was that when the black sedan stopped after colliding with the median, the two officers didn't wait for support and immediately took action.
As a result, one of their sidearms was taken and an innocent driver was tragically shot and killed.
Police agencies must therefore address two pressing matters.
In addition to reviewing police training, it is even more important that they communicate with citizens' groups to articulate measures that are adapted to the increasing flow of firearms into Taiwan.
This protocol must let people know that forceful police action is for the personal protection of the officers, as well as the safety of innocent citizens.
Wang Hsiao-Ming is a visiting professor in the department of police administration at Central Police University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US