The Cabinet recently decided to promote a national languages development bill (
However, the law will recognize all local languages used in Taiwan as "national" languages rather than "official" languages. In other words, this is no more than a political statement.
The UN has officially declared that some of Taiwan's languages are in danger of dying out. Surely, something can be done to reverse this situation.
The view among academics is that for a language to survive and develop, alphabetization, standardization, and modernization are required. Another -- and more important -- requirement is that at least 75 percent of the ethnic population use the language actively.
If the government really wants to respect all Taiwanese languages, it should consider making more of them "official." For example, in the areas populated by the Amis tribe, the Amis language should be adopted as an official language to be used in all official documents, thus giving the Amis language a chance of revival and development. That would be the act of a government that is truly modern, civilized and localized -- but with a global outlook.
A few concrete suggestions could be helpful:
First, a national survey on the current use of native languages should be conducted.
Native language teachers should be trained and the demand for native language teachers should be based on the national language survey.
Textbooks and extracurricular reading materials in the different languages, including technical, legal, medical, arts dictionaries as well as dictionaries in other fields should be written.
An appropriate increase should be made in the number of native language classes and fluency should be a requirement in examinations.
Bilingual education with the native language as the spoken language in class should be promoted.
Romanization education should start at an earlier stage to promote educational efficiency.
Government institutions at all levels and schools should establish a native language community service plan.
Finally, native language education and the gradual achievement of the goal of elevating all native languages to the level of official languages within 30 years should be encouraged.
Tiunn Hok Chu is a physician and a member of the Southern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with