Transitional justice is an important part of Taiwan's path to social equality, justice and normal statehood. Improving social equality and justice includes uncovering the truth about the 228 Incident and the return of the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) stolen assets to the public. The march toward obtaining normal statehood includes the urgently required correction of the national title and the creation of a new constitution. These issues are currently been forcefully promoted and, though challenging, the creation of a new constitution has become an increasingly urgent task.
Let's look at two perspectives on the need for a new constitution.
First, a "one China" Constitution runs counter to the current cross-strait status quo. Creating a constitution for one's own country should be the natural order of things. Taiwan is a sovereign state; therefore, creating a new constitution does not change the status quo but is a true reflection of it. The idea of "one China" [including both China and Taiwan] is long outdated. More than 60 percent of people in Taiwan identify themselves as Taiwanese. Thus, neither domestic opposition nor the international community -- including the US, Japan and China -- have any reason to oppose Taiwan's creating a new constitution either by obstruction or threats.
Second, amending the Constitution is a formidable challenge. In 2005, the mission-oriented National Assembly amended the Constitution and designed a high threshold for constitutional amendments by requiring that three-quarters of all legislators are present at the vote, and that three-quarters of those present vote for the amendment. The amendment must then be put to a referendum where half of the total electorate must approve and pass the proposal. Implementing such high requirements is no different from blocking Taiwan from normalizing its status as a country.
Furthermore, the 2005 Constitutional amendment, the seventh, is fraught with problems. Not only does the mission-oriented National Assembly lack legitimacy and sufficient representativeness because of its small membership, but there is also a lack of social consensus behind the amendment because the final decision was made after a compromise only between the Democratic Progressive Party and the KMT, the two largest political parties.
This further highlights the difficulties in achieving normal country status through constitutional amendment. The problem is three-fold. First, cutting the number of legislative seats could well result in another "eternal" legislature [like the one that was elected in China in 1948 and remained in place until 1992]. It also expands the power of legislators and gives advantages to incumbents.
Second, the result of the single-member district double-ballot system beginning with the next legislative elections is that all votes are not equal. For example, the new system stipulates that each city and county elect at least one legislator, which means that a vote in cities and counties with small populations like Kinmen and Matsu will be more influential than a vote in counties and cities with higher populations. This violates democratic principles.
Third, single-vote districts may result in M-shaped public opinion, since candidates in the end will be forced to make ideological appeals to pan-blue or pan-green supporters which will only further promote the creation of a politically M-shaped society.
In the 1990s, former president Lee Teng-hui (
Margot Chen is a research fellow at Taiwan Advocates, a think tank initiated by former president Lee Teng-hui.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US