In January, the EU expanded eastward once again. Following the "Big Bang" enlargement of 2004, which added 75 million new EU citizens, the accession of Romania and Bulgaria has added 30 million more. What does this mean for the labor markets of Western Europe? Politicians tend to argue that, although some plumbers migrate to the west and companies relocate to the east, the west will enjoy more jobs in net terms as a result of the likely expansion of its exports. That reasoning is familiar, but is it correct?
One thing is certain: Enlargement has confronted Western Europe with extremely stiff wage competition. Whereas an employee in the old EU's manufacturing sector on average earns 26.09 euros (US$34.48) per hour, in Romania the average is 1.60 euros and in Bulgaria a mere 1.39 euros.
The view that eastward enlargement will create jobs in the west assumes that East European low-wage workers will complement, and boost demand for, West European workers. In fact, this is partly the case. West European engineers are needed to design world-class products to be manufactured by East European workers, while people with managerial skills can be sure that their abilities will be needed to integrate the EU's newest workers into the European economy.
But for the great majority of workers who have only their normal labor to sell, East European employees are actually substitutes, not complements. They find themselves confronted by low-wage competition from people who have similar skills and ambitions, and are consequently likely to lose ground from enlargement. According to empirical studies, the group of losers ranges from low-skilled to skilled workers with a completed educational training.
The implications for the labor market are clear: For the highly qualified in the West European workforce, eastern enlargement will lead to an increase in labor demand; for all others, it will mean a decrease. As a result of a fundamental asymmetry in the flexibility of wages, this will lead to a net decline of employment. Since unemployment is low among the more highly qualified, higher demand for their services will lead to an increase in wages rather than an increase in employment. For the less qualified in Western Europe, a decrease in employment will be inevitable, because the scope for wage fluctuation is limited by collective agreements and by the minimum-wage levels that the welfare state sets through wage-replacement benefits and legal minimum wages. Wage inflexibility, combined with the substitution effect exerted on the great majority of West European workers implies that eastern enlargement will cause a net loss of jobs in Western Europe, if the labor market remains as inflexible as it now is.
To be sure, eastern enlargement is leading to an increase in West European exports, because more markets have been opened in which western firms can sell their products. However, if exports increase, the factors of production -- namely capital, qualified workers and unskilled workers -- must be diverted from other sectors of the economy, and this leads to a loss of jobs there. Since export goods are considerably more capital and knowledge-intensive in their production than other goods, the structural change will even reduce the net demand for unskilled labor: capital and talents that move away from the other sectors will not take all the unskilled workers with them.
The shrinking sectors include the labor-intensive upstream stages of the production process, where jobs have been outsourced to other countries -- a phenomenon that is neither apparent to customers nor reflected in statistics on foreign direct investment.
Moreover, while it is often conceded that jobs can be lost via foreign direct investment, much more important are financial capital exports, that is, the loans that enable foreign firms to create jobs on their own turf. Consider Germany, which last year exported capital worth 108 billion euros, only 25 billion euros of which was for direct investments, whereas net domestic investment in all sectors combined was only 75 billion euros. Part of this capital export flowed to the new EU members in Eastern Europe, which enjoyed, relative to their size, gigantic capital imports.
Considering all these factors, the assertion that the EU's eastward enlargement will lead to net job creation in Western Europe appears to be nothing more than empty politically correct rhetoric. Western European wages are far too rigid for the benefits of competition and sectoral change to be shared by a majority of workers.
Hans-Werner Sinn is professor of economics and finance at the University of Munich and president of the Ifo Institute.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers