In January, the EU expanded eastward once again. Following the "Big Bang" enlargement of 2004, which added 75 million new EU citizens, the accession of Romania and Bulgaria has added 30 million more. What does this mean for the labor markets of Western Europe? Politicians tend to argue that, although some plumbers migrate to the west and companies relocate to the east, the west will enjoy more jobs in net terms as a result of the likely expansion of its exports. That reasoning is familiar, but is it correct?
One thing is certain: Enlargement has confronted Western Europe with extremely stiff wage competition. Whereas an employee in the old EU's manufacturing sector on average earns 26.09 euros (US$34.48) per hour, in Romania the average is 1.60 euros and in Bulgaria a mere 1.39 euros.
The view that eastward enlargement will create jobs in the west assumes that East European low-wage workers will complement, and boost demand for, West European workers. In fact, this is partly the case. West European engineers are needed to design world-class products to be manufactured by East European workers, while people with managerial skills can be sure that their abilities will be needed to integrate the EU's newest workers into the European economy.
But for the great majority of workers who have only their normal labor to sell, East European employees are actually substitutes, not complements. They find themselves confronted by low-wage competition from people who have similar skills and ambitions, and are consequently likely to lose ground from enlargement. According to empirical studies, the group of losers ranges from low-skilled to skilled workers with a completed educational training.
The implications for the labor market are clear: For the highly qualified in the West European workforce, eastern enlargement will lead to an increase in labor demand; for all others, it will mean a decrease. As a result of a fundamental asymmetry in the flexibility of wages, this will lead to a net decline of employment. Since unemployment is low among the more highly qualified, higher demand for their services will lead to an increase in wages rather than an increase in employment. For the less qualified in Western Europe, a decrease in employment will be inevitable, because the scope for wage fluctuation is limited by collective agreements and by the minimum-wage levels that the welfare state sets through wage-replacement benefits and legal minimum wages. Wage inflexibility, combined with the substitution effect exerted on the great majority of West European workers implies that eastern enlargement will cause a net loss of jobs in Western Europe, if the labor market remains as inflexible as it now is.
To be sure, eastern enlargement is leading to an increase in West European exports, because more markets have been opened in which western firms can sell their products. However, if exports increase, the factors of production -- namely capital, qualified workers and unskilled workers -- must be diverted from other sectors of the economy, and this leads to a loss of jobs there. Since export goods are considerably more capital and knowledge-intensive in their production than other goods, the structural change will even reduce the net demand for unskilled labor: capital and talents that move away from the other sectors will not take all the unskilled workers with them.
The shrinking sectors include the labor-intensive upstream stages of the production process, where jobs have been outsourced to other countries -- a phenomenon that is neither apparent to customers nor reflected in statistics on foreign direct investment.
Moreover, while it is often conceded that jobs can be lost via foreign direct investment, much more important are financial capital exports, that is, the loans that enable foreign firms to create jobs on their own turf. Consider Germany, which last year exported capital worth 108 billion euros, only 25 billion euros of which was for direct investments, whereas net domestic investment in all sectors combined was only 75 billion euros. Part of this capital export flowed to the new EU members in Eastern Europe, which enjoyed, relative to their size, gigantic capital imports.
Considering all these factors, the assertion that the EU's eastward enlargement will lead to net job creation in Western Europe appears to be nothing more than empty politically correct rhetoric. Western European wages are far too rigid for the benefits of competition and sectoral change to be shared by a majority of workers.
Hans-Werner Sinn is professor of economics and finance at the University of Munich and president of the Ifo Institute.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from