Two months ago, Paris' political insiders were unanimous: The presidential race was still open, but French Socialist candidate Segolene Royal was clearly the favorite. Today, the reverse seems true. While the race is not over, UMP candidate Nicolas Sarkozy has emerged as the consistent favorite in the polls, as well as of those who declared him nearly defeated in early December.
The new consensus can be described as follows: Royal cannot defeat Sarkozy, but Sarkozy can defeat himself.
Why has the Socialist candidate, the first woman who had a serious chance to be elected President of France, fallen from grace so quickly? And why has Sarkozy proved to be so resilient, despite the often negative passions aroused by his personality?
If Royal is defeated, it will not be because she is a woman, but in spite of it. The French are ready for a woman, but perhaps not this one. She is beautiful, energetic, resolute and in many ways surprising. Indeed, on issues such as law and order, respect for authority and nationalism, one finds her positions far from what one would expect of a Socialist candidate.
But Royal has so far failed to rally her camp behind her. Her campaign's combination of authoritarianism and confusion, if not sheer incompetence, is sapping her supporters' morale while confirming the deep reservations of her opponents.
Whatever their political preferences, many French voters have the feeling that an "amateur" is facing a "professional."
Whereas Sarkozy has managed to impose himself on the right without the support of President Jacques Chirac, the Socialist heavyweights cannot fully convince themselves to come out behind Royal. Her defeat would be theirs, too, but their resentment over losing the nomination to her is so far proving stronger than their political survival instincts.
Limited appeal
Royal's emphasis on participatory democracy -- "Tell me what you want, I will be your spokesperson" -- has so far shown itself to have limited appeal.
Voters like to be consulted, and citizens love to express themselves, but at the end of the day, they want a leader, someone they can trust. In other terms, they don't want only a receptive ear, but a reassuring, authoritative and competent figure.
Two months before the vote, the presidential campaign has demonstrated that the modernization, if not "Americanization," of French politics -- for example, heavy use of the Internet -- has taken hold. But the campaign is also proving the resilience of "classical politics." Royal may have presented herself as a "post-modern" politician, but it is a "classical" politician who seems to be winning.
At the same time, Sarkozy has been able to emerge as the natural leader of the right partly because Chirac has been less of a liability than many people, including the experts, predicted. Indeed, the reverse seems to be true, which perhaps reflects the tendency of French voters to adopt a positive view of departing presidents.
Chirac himself has orchestrated his departure with grace, presenting himself in the best possible light with personal confidences and public speeches. It is as if France were now seized by a kind of nostalgic generosity toward a presidency that had been marked by suspicion and derision. Chirac is not about to present himself as a candidate to divide the conservative camp and the new leniency surrounding his record may actually benefit Sarkozy, his impatient and rebellious heir.
Yet opposition to Sarkozy remains high, and not only among minorities and young people, who have registered to vote in high numbers, supposedly to oppose him and his heavy use of the police in the banlieues.
"Bonaparte" may be about to triumph easily over "Joan of Arc," as some foreign commentators like to describe the two leading candidates, but Sarkozy's supposedly "Bonapartist" qualities have fueled a potent sense of apprehension.
Reservations
In fact, the persistence of strong reservations about both Royal and Sarkozy helps explain the surge in popularity for a third contender, UDF candidate Francois Bayrou, a traditional centrist, pro-European politician.
Bayrou has never had it so good but, barring the unlikely collapse of one of the two leading candidates' campaigns, he will fail to qualify for the second-round runoff.
In our media-dominated age, personalities ultimately matter more than programs, which means that elimination prevails over selection. That process seems to favor Sarkozy. An anybody-but-Sarkozy reflex may exist in some circles of French society but, in order to prevail, a credible alternative is required. So far, Royal has failed to play that role.
Dominique Moisi, a founder of and senior adviser at the French Institute for International Relations, is also a professor at the College of Europe in Natolin, Warsaw.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level