After the unsuccessful attempt to oust the president last year, this year, before a verdict is handed down in the first lady's embezzlement trial, it would seem that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is holding back just for the sake of it.
Just a few days ago, the government announced it would rename government-owned companies and places whose names referred to China. This included Chang Kai-Shek Memorial Hall, one of the most important and remarkable landmarks and tourist attractions in the nation.
The reason for this move is to "restore and emphasize the importance of Taiwan's international status," government officials said.
In addition to the memorial, all government-owned industries -- including the post office, the petroleum company, the shipbuilding company and the partially privatized telecom company will be renamed to contain Taiwan in their names instead of Chunghwa or China.
Over the years since the DPP was formed, they have emphasized the importance of making Taiwan a country under the name Taiwan instead of the Republic of China, which the Nationalist Party (KMT) used.
Indeed, Taiwan is different from China, but ever since Chang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his followers fled China for Taiwan, the historic link is undeniable. If we abolish everything that is linked to China, our history will only have begun in 1949, or even later, from when former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was in charge.
Obviously the public disagrees with the change. Almost 70 percent of surveyed people believe the name change will not make any difference. But officials have said that the process will go-ahead
Is this democracy?
Regardless of when Taiwan's history started or who the founders of Taiwan are, the core motivation for this process is to get the world to recognize Taiwan as a democratic country.
Dealing with real problems in our system, such as governmental systems prone to corruption, would be the best way to gain the respect of the international community.
Changing street names doesn't prove anything.
Monica Hsueh
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers