The recent enthusiasm for revisionism in Taiwan is a reminder that the nation's democracy is still in its infancy. At the same time, it is a sign of vigor.
In the latest edition of history textbooks for high school students, Sun Yat-sen (
This change to a 60-year-old practice was inspired by more than just the realization that Sun's position in Taiwanese history is a result of concerted efforts by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Rather, it's recognition of the fact that much of what is ailing Taiwanese politics today can be traced back to the KMT's attempts to glorify the occupation of Taiwan by Chiang Kai-shek (
In fact, the new depiction of Sun is just one part of the first significant overhaul of high school textbooks in an attempt to make them more Taiwan-centric. The revamp's purpose of bringing education more in line with the political reality in a country where three direct presidential elections have taken place in the last dozen years should not overshadow its significance in the overall scheme of decolonization of Taiwan. The outcry from former KMT chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
There were years when these colonialists -- disavowed by their home country and severed from their homeland -- were left without much hope of ever being able to fulfill their dreams of returning home in triumph. At one point, late president Chiang Ching-kuo (
But the visits by former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) to Beijing nearly two years ago changed everything. The pact Lien made with Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) rekindled the dormant colonial sentiment in diehard Chiang followers.
This rekindled hope is the real reason why Ma and the KMT are so resistant to the idea of a new constitution and continue to drag their feet on arms procurement -- they dream of one day unifying with China.
It also helps to explain the pan-blue legislative coalition's fondness for coffer-busting measures such as the 18 percent interest rate on public employee pensions and the NT$40 billion (US$1.21 million) package of largesse for veterans.
Ma's claims that the KMT's stolen assets were acquired legitimately is a tacit admission that the party has always been a colonial presence.
The self-righteousness which Ma and his like exude, seemingly oblivious of how outrageous their attitudes are in the context of a modern democracy, only reinforces the idea that they live in a colonial cocoon of their own creation.
What's most astonishing is that while many are preoccupied with combating the onslaught of colonialism, former president Lee Teng-hui (
At a minimum, he appears to be on the fence.
The public would do well to realize that while individuals might vacillate when it is politically expedient to do so, democratic principles remain constant.
The removal of two paternal icons could serve to strengthen Taiwan's democracy.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers