Anyone wanting to celebrate the good news that Taiwan's exports increased by 17.9 percent last month should temper their jubilation by looking at which country was responsible for buying most of the goods: China.
This warning is not born of knee-jerk "China is the root of all evil" prejudice. The fact is that, as Taiwan's economy ties itself to China's, Taiwan shares much of the risk that comes with the rapid economic growth across the Strait.
There is absolutely no reason why Taiwan should not take advantage of China's "economic miracle," as the more exuberant analysts prefer to paint it.
Companies have every right and every reason to try to make a pretty penny as China transforms itself from a lumbering communist behemoth -- rife with petty corruption and beset with a byzantine bureaucracy -- to a lumbering capitalist behemoth with the same problems.
But what the latest export figures indicate is that Taiwanese companies may not be making enough of an effort to market themselves to the rest of the world.
We have heard a lot of talk from the government and some of the nation's bigger companies about the need to focus on "branding" and on how Taiwan should emphasize research and development.
Hardly a week passes when the public isn't regaled with proposals to turn Taiwan into a center for this or that, be it a "regional transportation hub" or a "regional financial hub."
All of this regional hub-bubbing may sound impressive, but without the political will, these good intentions may only pave the road to hell, as the saying goes.
The pan-blue alliance and the pan-green camp are both fond of describing themselves as having the "most business-oriented" political agenda. Obviously this cannot be true for both sides at once. The reality is that neither party is particularly business-oriented, preferring instead to waste taxpayers' time and funds on inane bickering in the legislature and elsewhere.
The pan-green camp is presently spending a lot of time and energy on symbolic gestures, such as changing the names of state-run companies and getting rid of statues of dictator Chiang Kai-shek (
The pan-green camp must show a pragmatic Taiwanese polity that it has a vision for the future, instead of relying so heavily on the past for its political capital in belated attempts to build a new national identity.
This is not to say that the pan-blue camp isn't just as bad, or worse.
Pan-blue-camp supporters have nothing to be proud of. What has the pan-blue camp done for Taiwan in the past seven years, aside from regularly attempting to subvert Taiwan's democracy with short-sighted -- and often unconstitutional -- power-grabs?
It is hard to see how politicians of any stripe could hold their heads up high when they talk about the record of their parties over the past few years. This nation's recent political history can be summed up thus: "One side proposed this, and the other side opposed it. One side said this was true, and the other side disagreed."
There is a world outside of Taiwan, and most of it doesn't care one whit about this country's domestic issues. Our politicians must consider this when they attempt to balance critical domestic matters with the pressing problem of how to better engage the rest of the world.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US