The good news for Chiang Kai-shek (
The statues of Chiang that had been a ubiquitous feature of the nation's streets, parks and military bases have been subjected to increasingly diffident treatment since power transferred from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in 2000.
DPP legislators have asked the Ministry of National Defense to move all of the statues at its bases indoors before the anniversary of the 228 Incident at the end of this month. The party is also working to have Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall renamed "Taiwan Democracy Hall." After a report last year on the 228 Incident placed the blame for the incident on Chiang and with the coming 60th anniversary of the incident, anti-Chiang sentiment has seen something of a revival.
Many Taiwanese grew up being told that the dictator was the "savior of the people and a hero of the world."
But Taiwan has democratized, power has shifted and society isn't obliged to suffer KMT brainwashing any longer.
Now Taiwan can freely gather the facts and decide what Chiang's legacy should be.
After decades of reflection, Taiwan's negative view of Chiang has grown firmer. While in China, Chiang succeeded in leading the Northern Expedition to defeat the warlords and unify China. But Chiang was a warlord himself who fostered corruption and civil strife in his quest for power.
Although he led the Nationalists against the Japanese, his rule remained unstable after the Japanese defeat, ultimately leading to civil war in China and the Nationalists' retreat to Taiwan.
Chiang's military crackdown during the 228 Incident led to massive loss of life. The purges of the White Terror era that followed led to the killing and imprisonment of many dissidents and activists.
Chiang always considered himself a visitor and viewed Taiwan as just a base for an invasion to recapture China. He was never accepted in the same way as his reformist son Chiang Ching-kuo (
Like many things, power is fleeting. With the loss of the influence that elevated Chiang to his position as dictator, the adulation he received earlier has all but disappeared.
Opinions have always been polarized on Chiang's rule, but a democratic Taiwan should make an even-handed assessment of his historical position.
An even-handed assessment is based on facts. It is a fact that Chiang had tens of thousands of Taiwanese killed. It is a fact that he had thousands more imprisoned, ripping them away from their families because they dared to challenge their oppressor. It is a fact that the KMT, the world's wealthiest political party, amassed assets during Chiang's corrupt rule by stealing them from Taiwanese, their rightful owners.
An even-handed assessment was delayed by years of KMT rule and it has taken seven long years for the DPP to remove the statues.
But better late than never. The government should let Taiwanese society freely discuss what Chiang's legacy should be. The statues are relatively unimportant in themselves, but while some might see them as representing Chiang as a hero, others will see the statues as proof of the KMT's efforts to keep Taiwanese in a state of symbolic subjugation.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS