The European Commission's grand strategy for the EU to lead the world in fighting climate change and switch to a low-carbon economy was in disarray on Tuesday -- less than two weeks after it was set out with a loud self-congratulatory fanfare.
The first fruit of that strategy -- a legislative plan to force the European car industry to cut carbon dioxide emissions from new cars to 120g per km by 2012 -- was due to be presented today. Instead, commission President Jose Manuel Barroso shelved it in the face of contradictory proposals from two of his senior colleagues at the environment and industry departments.
As green campaigners condemned Brussels for failing to deliver on its first "real-world" policy since setting an ambitious target of cutting greenhouse gases by at least 20 percent by 2020, commissioners fell out over the best way to achieve that target in the car industry. German ministers holding the EU presidency admitted their coalition government was not only at loggerheads with carmakers but was also divided itself.
A senior German source in Brussels highlighted the rifts, saying: "If we force a target of 120g per kilometer on each new car, we would have to close DaimlerChrysler, Audi, BMW and Porsche and that's not possible. We have to make Europe the leader in green technology while boosting output and jobs."
The British car industry and its European counterpart waded into the row. Car prices in Europe could soar if legislation forced the cuts envisaged, the UK's Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) warned. ACEA, its continental equivalent, said legislation on making car engines more efficient would add up to 4,000 euros (US$5,100) to the price of each new car. That could drive production of small cars overseas and be ten times less effective than a wider package of measures to cut emissions, it argued.
European Commission Commissioner for Environment Stavros Dimas proposes forcing carmakers to improve engines and cut emissions, but European Commission Vice President Gunter Verheugen wants a larger package of measures to include wider use of bio-fuels and green incentives for drivers.
The two have not even contacted each other in recent weeks. German Federal Environment Minister Sigmar Gabriel said he had not discussed the issue with fellow German social democrat Verheugen and flatly contradicted a central plank of the vice president's alternative plan.
Barroso, desperate for consensus within his 27-strong commission, said proposals for binding legislation to enforce the 120g target by 2012 would be presented "very soon" -- possibly next week. But Dimas' proposals to legislate on engine technology alone will now be complemented by other measures such as greater use of bio-fuels.
It is accepted across the commission that the European car industry has no prospect of reaching its voluntary target, set in 1995, of cutting emissions to 140g by next year.
The industry average in 2005 was 163g and is unlikely to fall much below 160g by next year. So legislation on a tougher target is required, although Japan, the frontrunner in green cars, has set an unambitious target of just 138g by 2015.
Verheugen is believed to have persuaded Barroso that full legislative proposals can come only after an "impact assessment," requiring at least a year's work.
He insists Dimas recommit to their jointly agreed policy that the cars package embrace alternative fuels, tires and lubricants; measures to ease congestion; and even driver behavior, or adopting policies to encourage car owners to switch to greener vehicles.
This is the "integrated" approach favored by the SMMT and ACEA, whose ferocious lobbying, including stark warnings on jobs, appears to have won the day. Gabriel said the German government also favored including bio-fuels but ruled out "driver behavior" as effectively privatizing the issue -- and rejected proposals favored by Verheugen to include cars in the EU's emissions trading scheme as "too complex" and "technically impossible."
The disarray among policymakers was heightened when it emerged that there was no consensus on how the 120g target would be applied. An option favored by German ministers is to set targets according to the class of vehicle, with tougher ones for smaller cars.
Green campaigners said failure to announce legislation to meet the 120g target "would seriously undermine the commission's credibility" and that making alternative policies such as bio-fuels count towards the target weakened it.
Claude Turmes, a Green MEP, said: "Only by introducing binding limits will we properly address the climate-damaging fumes spewed by cars. The commission ... must not cave in to the car lobby."
The SMMT said legislation backed by fines would force the industry to switch to hybrid models -- vehicles with both internal combustion and electric engines -- "overnight." Hybrid models are about US$5,800 more expensive than their conventional equivalents, say officials.
Christopher Macgowan, SMMT chief executive, called for an integrated approach involving the industry, governments and consumers.
"We are calling for practical measures, based on the principle that working together will deliver the greatest benefits for the environment, without crippling the European car industry with unrealistic targets and disproportionate costs," he said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US