The legislature will soon debate a draft law proposed by Democratic Progressive Party Legislator William Lai (
On Jan. 17, Hsieh Yen-yao (
Although Lai's proposed law may not be perfect, it is a step in the right direction. It could help improve the way medical accidents are handled in Taiwan.
The nation needs to find a better way to manage such accidents than its complicated array of legislation, including the Civil Code (民法), Criminal Code (刑法), Physicians' Code (醫師法), Medical Treatment Act (醫療法), Consumer Protection Act (消保法) and the Drug Injury Relief Act (藥害救濟法). There are also major controversies over whether some of these laws can be applied. This disordered system only serves to highlight how far behind the times Taiwan's medical laws are. Lai's effort to deal with medical accidents under a single law should be seen as progress.
Hsieh questioned the plausibility of Lai's proposal by saying that the Drug Injury Relief Act -- which offers victims compensation for injuries caused from taking medicine -- has done nothing to check the increase of malpractice lawsuits in the six years since it was implemented. In fact, medication is just one of many causes of medical injury.
One can't use the increase in all medical lawsuits to prove that the Drug Injury Relief Law has been a failure.
Handling medical mistakes under the Criminal Code implies that any treatment that leads to a person's death is a matter for public prosecution. Under this logic, prosecutors should investigate every death in a hospital. They should file a public lawsuit as soon as they suspect an error was made.
The Criminal Code is the wrong law to use; fatal medical injuries have always been prosecuted only when a complaint is recived, never automatically. Hsieh's assertion that Lai's law "would be powerless in cases of fatal medical injury" is incorrect.
Hsieh claims that under the law, worries over the responsibility to make compensation for medical errors -- which are extremely difficult to completely eliminate -- would intrude into decisions on treatment. This is a misunderstanding. The responsibility to provide legal compensation for damages is laid out in Article 22 of the new version of the Medical Treatment Act, but Lai's law talks about compensation as a form of supplemental social aid. These are two different things. Legal compensation requires that the courts decide which party is right and which is wrong beforehand. There is no necessity for social compensation. Legal wrangling only delays the provision of social relief.
Without settlements, there would be even more malpractice lawsuits.
What a shame that in recent years an increasing number of people have been choosing to sue rather than settle, creating ever more tense relations between doctors and patients. As a result, important fields like internal medicine, surgery, obstetrics and pediatrics are now having trouble attracting doctors.
Kuo Cheng-deng is the director of the Graduate Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine at National Yang-Ming University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95