One of Taiwan's more inspiring characteristics is the striking degree of harmony that exists between its indigenous Austronesian population and the Han Taiwanese community, and particularly in the light of the nation's bloody past. Compared with other countries in the region such as Australia and China, Taiwanese Aborigines are quite free of the aggressive racism of officials and ordinary people in the former nation or of the political and religious repression of the latter.
So when the Council of Indigenous Peoples announced the nation's official recognition of a 13th Aboriginal "tribe," it was a credit to activists, the government and the wider community that the desire of people to be known by others as they would know themselves was embraced so smoothly. The 13th "tribe" is the Sakiraya (also rendered as Sakizaya) of northern Hualien County, who were formerly included in the Amis, the nation's largest group of Aboriginal people.
Celebrations aside, an opportunity is presented to identify deeper problems that official recognition and ceremonial pride tend to shield from wider view.
The concepts of "tribe" and even "people" are misleading in categorizing Taiwan's indigenous populations, because traditional Aboriginal lives revolved around the village or groups of allied villages, often of varying size. The idea that a common language in itself united Aboriginal communities in practical terms is fallacious, even though the current naming scheme seeks to do just that.
Since the arrival of the Japanese, and especially since the arrival of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government, conceptions of village loyalty and the anthropological structures that bolstered them were manipulated and often damaged by officials seeking to inculcate devotion to the Japanese emperor or to the Chinese state.
When modern-day Aboriginal activists began fighting back against the KMT in the late 1970s and early 1980s, the need to establish a respectful group title was the priority; the end result in the mid-1990s was the term yuanzhumin (original inhabitants).
The derogatory or racist terms that yuanzhumin supplanted have little currency these days. And now that Aborigines have their own Cabinet-level bureaucracy, the symbolic fight has turned away from distinctiveness from Han Taiwanese and toward distinctiveness from each other.
The Council of Indigenous Peoples is not keen to stress this, but the fact remains that even today Aboriginal society does not readily lend itself to pan-ethnic solidarity, and this applies as much at the present "tribal" level as the catch-all "Aboriginal" level. This problem has been institutionalized by divisions that flare up at election time as a handsome majority of candidates apply the lessons of their one-time KMT masters and bribe as many voters as their campaign budgets will possibly allow.
Democratic processes have, ironically enough, wrought damage on the most fundamental level of Aboriginal society in order that Aborigines can compete with and have a voice among Han Taiwanese at the county and national levels.
So when Premier Su Tseng-chang (
Romantic notions of Aboriginal empowerment must be put aside so that the fundamentals stay in focus: village economics, resources, language survival and local autonomy. Changing names may be an important step in some cases, but never the solution.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers