Few have HAD kind words for former DPP legislator Lin Cho-shui (
But economic growth does not necessarily entail the creation of new jobs. When economic growth fails to relieve unemployment, it is known as jobless growth. This has been the case in the Taiwan. Even though the nation's overall economic growth has been reasonably good, unemployment has not declined significantly and income disparity has increased.
To a certain extent, jobless growth and income disparity have been caused by policies encouraging capital and technology-intensive industries to develop.
Data shows that in 1986, GDP growth was directly related to the creation of new jobs. For each percentage point of GDP growth, the rate of employment increased by 0.38 percent. In the 1990s, the corresponding employment increase fell to just 0.19 percent. Now, it would seem to be even lower.
In his new book Community: Taiwan Under the Sign of the World, Lin examines economic issues in the context of globalization and the US-China-Taiwan IT supply chain. This approach leads him to see jobless growth as being inevitable.
While Lin's approach is interesting, Taiwan's options are not limited to jobless growth.
In 1998, a Chinese Academy Of Science task force made a number of policy recommendations in a study entitled "Employment and Development: The Chinese Unemployment Question and Employment Strategies."
These recommendations included making lower unemployment rates an economic policy objective at every level of government.
Lin -- and the entire DPP administration for that matter -- should think carefully about the academy's recommendation to make low unemployment a top priority.
But the government has never really made employment its top economic priority. The technocrats who oversaw the economy under the KMT believed that growth solved all problems, and the DPP thinks the same way now. The reality though is that income disparities are widening unacceptably for any democratic government. The DPP began its rise to power as a champion of the poor and cannot continue to allow the rich-poor gap to widen.
The overseers of a nation's economy should balance economic growth and market efficiency with equitable distribution.
The DPP leadership must not fall into the trap of "economic development first" -- the credo of the KMT's economic planners. Instead, they should take the issue of economic justice seriously.
In 2001, US President George W. Bush was received by late pope John Paul II, who asked Bush to narrow the world's enormous rich-poor gap.
At the end of that same year, a group of US religious leaders of different faiths delivered a joint statement to the US government demanding global economic justice and proclaiming five major principles. These included demanding that international trade and investment systems not violate the dignity of the human person, protecting the most vulnerable and opening negotiations and decision-making to to those most affected by them.
The statement also called for world trade that respects civil society and the right of local communities to pursue sustainable development of their resources.
Greed is the essence of capitalism. If Lin had thought about this more seriously, his vision of the nation would have been a more equitable one.
Lin Kuo-hua is a pseudonym for a National Taiwan University academic who wishes to remain anonymous.
TRANSLATED BY MICHAEL FAHEY
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US