Dan Bloom's "Goodbye to the `Taiwan Province' of the Roads" (Jan. 4, page 8) touches on the idea of a nation that is beginning to realize its true identity. But by focusing on the removal of the words "Taiwan Province" from license plates, he merely scratches the surface of what's in a name or phrase.
Nonetheless, this fact alone is ringing alarm bells in Beijing because now the cat is getting out of the bag!
Simply put, language equals culture, for without a language there can be no culture. In Taiwan's case, this concept has two very important lenses: the micro and the macro. From the micro side of the lens, we see Taiwan as a nation that is struggling with its self-identity, hindered or ameliorated by its acceptance or rejection of sinicization.
From the macro we see the world wondering just what Taiwan is.
However, one can bet Taiwan is largely, if not officially, seen through a Chinese lens.
How many Chinese language schools are going up around the world? How many Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) schools are doing the same?
Taiwan now finds itself trying to take off a label without taking off any of the fabric. If Taiwan's official language is Hoklo, why does it use Chinese? Even though Taiwanese is not a written language, it can be made into one by unifying a code of writing similar to pinyin. Language is key. Why did the Japanese forbid Taiwanese from speaking their mother tongue? It was largely for control and repression of identity.
As a Canadian I can easily put my country's flag on my backpack and virtually everyone will know my identity, or at least assume they know it. However, if I were to walk around any other country with the Taiwanese flag, no one would react.
A knowing observer wishing to engage me in conversation would probably initiate it by speaking in either French or English -- my assumed identity would prompt a geography-based linguistic response -- if not for the international language of English itself. So language is key and it is the the flag of (assumed) identity.
China is the internationally recognized center of the Chinese world. So is Taipei the center of Taiwan. But it is not a "Taiwanese" Taipei -- it is a "Chinese" Taipei. The focal lens /flag is Chinese. The fact that few people in Taipei speak Hoklo when their brothers and sisters in the south do speaks volumes, if not reams from the Book of the Dead. Lose a language and you lose a culture.
Bring Hoklo back into the schools and the workplace and give it a space on the world stage. Taiwan should seek to become a World Heritage site and to that end elicit the help of Taiwanese aboriginals in laying a foundation to a true Taiwanese identity.
Kevin Larson
Chiayi City
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US