Dan Bloom's "Goodbye to the `Taiwan Province' of the Roads" (Jan. 4, page 8) touches on the idea of a nation that is beginning to realize its true identity. But by focusing on the removal of the words "Taiwan Province" from license plates, he merely scratches the surface of what's in a name or phrase.
Nonetheless, this fact alone is ringing alarm bells in Beijing because now the cat is getting out of the bag!
Simply put, language equals culture, for without a language there can be no culture. In Taiwan's case, this concept has two very important lenses: the micro and the macro. From the micro side of the lens, we see Taiwan as a nation that is struggling with its self-identity, hindered or ameliorated by its acceptance or rejection of sinicization.
From the macro we see the world wondering just what Taiwan is.
However, one can bet Taiwan is largely, if not officially, seen through a Chinese lens.
How many Chinese language schools are going up around the world? How many Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) schools are doing the same?
Taiwan now finds itself trying to take off a label without taking off any of the fabric. If Taiwan's official language is Hoklo, why does it use Chinese? Even though Taiwanese is not a written language, it can be made into one by unifying a code of writing similar to pinyin. Language is key. Why did the Japanese forbid Taiwanese from speaking their mother tongue? It was largely for control and repression of identity.
As a Canadian I can easily put my country's flag on my backpack and virtually everyone will know my identity, or at least assume they know it. However, if I were to walk around any other country with the Taiwanese flag, no one would react.
A knowing observer wishing to engage me in conversation would probably initiate it by speaking in either French or English -- my assumed identity would prompt a geography-based linguistic response -- if not for the international language of English itself. So language is key and it is the the flag of (assumed) identity.
China is the internationally recognized center of the Chinese world. So is Taipei the center of Taiwan. But it is not a "Taiwanese" Taipei -- it is a "Chinese" Taipei. The focal lens /flag is Chinese. The fact that few people in Taipei speak Hoklo when their brothers and sisters in the south do speaks volumes, if not reams from the Book of the Dead. Lose a language and you lose a culture.
Bring Hoklo back into the schools and the workplace and give it a space on the world stage. Taiwan should seek to become a World Heritage site and to that end elicit the help of Taiwanese aboriginals in laying a foundation to a true Taiwanese identity.
Kevin Larson
Chiayi City
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers