This past weekend, just as the world was preparing to ring in the New Year, former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was executed. Three years after being captured by US forces, Saddam was hanged early on Saturday morning, the event broadcast worldwide with almost as much fervor and anticipation as the dawn of the New Year.
Whether or not Saddam received a fair trial and questions regarding the speed and timeliness of his execution will forever accompany the legacy of the infamous ruler.
In one of the many stories relating to the execution, a quotation from the Reverend Jesse Jackson has stuck with me. After preaching at a church in New York, the civil rights leader and former presidential candidate suggested that "killing him reduces our moral authority in the world."
I find myself questioning the Reverend's claim: When did we ever have moral authority?
Forget, for a moment, the fact that from the very beginning, the decision to attack Iraq was considered illegal by most of the international community. Forget the fact that the reason for going to war in the first place -- to rid Saddam of weapons of mass destruction -- has proven fallacious. Forget that despite all the bombs dropped and destruction caused by US-led forces, it is US companies who are now being awarded billion dollar contracts to rebuild the devastated country.
Forget the loss of life; the thousands of US and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Ignore, for an instant, all those obvious flaws with our presence in Iraq, and I still find it hard to comprehend how US leaders can talk about having "moral authority in the world."
Where does this "authority" come from and who bestowed it upon us? Are we to enforce our "authority" only when other nations ask for our assistance, or, as in the case of Iraq, when we deem necessary? And if our commitment to a moral standard is so great, why didn't we show some authority in Rwanda in 1994? Or in Sudan nowadays?
A country's size, wealth and influence in the world does not give it "moral authority" over anyone else. Nor should its faith mislead its people into thinking that they are morally superior to any other. Rather, it is a nation's policies, both domestic and international, that determine a country's decency.
I look forward to the day when US leaders understand that basic principle. For now, talk as they do about US "moral authority in the world," US policymakers have shown little regard for the fundamentally just principles upon which their country was founded.
Konraad Kordula
Taipei
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from