In 1948, the UN announced the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, setting a common standard for humanity following World War II.
In modern times the rights to freedom and equality have become the foundation of human rights.
After World War II, countries could be classified into those that advocated liberalism and those that advocated socialism. Liberal countries were based on the right to freedom, while socialist countries prioritized social rights, clashing ideologies that gave rise to the Cold War.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, freedom once again became the foundation of human rights in the form of so-called basic human rights.
The right to freedom also became the foundation on which social rights were built. Without the right to freedom, social rights are hollow.
To communist countries, which trample on the right to freedom, championing social rights is often an excuse to give the state the power to distribute resources or repress liberty.
As liberalism redefines itself in the modern era, some people have divided the concept of freedom into external and internal freedom.
External freedom means that one's values and dignity aren't dominated or infringed upon by others -- and certainly not by state power or agencies. External freedom is therefore freedom unhampered by fear.
Internal freedom concerns the freedom of thought. It means that each person has undeniable rights to self-realization and personal development. The state also has a duty to help people in these efforts.
In other respects, each person has the right to participate in society to stimulate self-growth.
Every person has the right to information, especially correct information.
On this point, neither government nor society should provide false or distorted information. This is a fundamental principle of the right to knowledge and is also the foundation of press freedom.
Fifty or 60 years ago Taiwan's authoritarian government was much like a fascist or communist administration. If the state wasn't using violence to violate the right of individuals to freedom, it was controlling the media to provide false information to strengthen state power.
Even though the regime has changed, the history of infringed human rights has not been thoroughly explored.
Although the government no longer uses state violence to encroach on human rights, when it comes to freedom of the press, the cultural vestiges of the party-state's influence on the media has led to continued misreporting and sensationalization of news that violates the public's right to informed knowledge.
The result is a stain on the spirit of all who consume this material.
Lee Yung-chih is a professor at the Graduate Institute of Taiwan History at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations