At a court hearing, rationality must be applied to the analysis of evidence and parties should refrain from irrational arguments.
The confusion surrounding the special "state affairs" fund is finally being reviewed in a court of law.
This case, however, has deep political implications.
Furthermore, it is legally complex and it is therefore difficult to see how a verdict will be reached smoothly.
First lady Wu Shu-jen (
Regardless, we are eagerly looking forward to a fair and just court review that will resolve any crisis and clarify all the confusing issues.
As this case is getting a lot of attention domestically and abroad, and because such a case has never been heard before, all three parties -- prosecutors, defense lawyers and the presiding judge -- seemed quite tense on the first day.
The court hearing saw intense exchanges between the parties.
Based on media reports, it seems the parties involved will all have to put an effort into cooling down and staying rational.
The lawyers for the four accused repeatedly said that the accusations were unconstitutional and violated legal procedures. They argued fiercely with both prosecutors and the judge.
One lawyer demanded that the judge remain just and fair and not be influenced by accusations made or reported by the media.
The judge reportedly retorted by asking whether the lawyer wanted him to take an oath or sign a written guarantee.
Emotions seemed to run high, and the judge surely felt insulted.
The lawyers also claimed that much evidence had not been reviewed. They requested that the judge temporarily suspend proceedings, but to no avail.
After the prosecutor finished reading the accusations, the presiding judge asked the accused if they were guilty, but their lawyers felt that the judge should not ask them about their guilt prior to questioning.
The prosecutor even wanted the lawyers to close their eyes and think about their ideals when they first started studying law.
The opening drama illustrated how the complications and emotions in this case far exceeded expectations.
The first issue at hand was whether the court hearing would be able to continue.
From a jurisprudential perspective, the president has immunity against criminal charges, but he has been implicated in the allegations in this trial.
The question is whether the trial against Wu violates the president's immunity.
The prosecutor and the judge must of course respond to the defense lawyers' claim that the review must be suspended since the proceedings are in violation of the Constitution.
The fact that the presiding judge and the prosecutor take the same stand on this issue also seems to be another source of conflict.
The presiding judge in particular must consider whether there will be any doubt about the verdict being constitutional.
Second, when it was decided that Wu would be prosecuted, the allegations regarding Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
Before the hearings began, however, it was discovered that false receipts and other irregularities had occurred in the reporting of Ma's fund expenditures.
The situation at the beginning of this review was very different from the situation at the time when the lawsuit was filed.
If this is a matter of karma, then the verdict in the special "state affairs" fund case will have a clear impact on the decision of whether or not the irregularities in the special allowance fund case should lead to prosecution and maybe even a guilty verdict.
The court faces another difficulty.
The case is highly politicized, and one could say it is closely intertwined with the ongoing political conflict, which means that it will be very difficult to depoliticize the review process and the verdict.
At the very least, the verdict will be unsatisfactory to one of the two political camps, and this poses a great challenge for the judiciary.
Judging from the first lady's poor condition at the initial court hearing, the court must improve.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (
It might have been an exaggeration to call the judge "inhumane," but media reports said: "When the doctors said Wu's systolic blood pressure had fallen to 50, the judge asked if she could return to the courtroom for further questioning within one or two hours if sent to the hospital. However, doctors said that she was not doing well, so they asked for her to be excused."
The judge seemed to be a bit too eager and showed a lack of understanding.
Wu's doctor said that her blood circulation was poor because of her paralysis from the waist down, and sitting still so long during the hearing had lowered her blood pressure even more.
This is a major lawsuit and the proceedings and verdict will have far-reaching consequences.
That means that the hearings must progress carefully without rushing things. This is not only necessary to reach a fair verdict, but also in taking Wu's health into consideration.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow at the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95