At a court hearing, rationality must be applied to the analysis of evidence and parties should refrain from irrational arguments.
The confusion surrounding the special "state affairs" fund is finally being reviewed in a court of law.
This case, however, has deep political implications.
Furthermore, it is legally complex and it is therefore difficult to see how a verdict will be reached smoothly.
First lady Wu Shu-jen (
Regardless, we are eagerly looking forward to a fair and just court review that will resolve any crisis and clarify all the confusing issues.
As this case is getting a lot of attention domestically and abroad, and because such a case has never been heard before, all three parties -- prosecutors, defense lawyers and the presiding judge -- seemed quite tense on the first day.
The court hearing saw intense exchanges between the parties.
Based on media reports, it seems the parties involved will all have to put an effort into cooling down and staying rational.
The lawyers for the four accused repeatedly said that the accusations were unconstitutional and violated legal procedures. They argued fiercely with both prosecutors and the judge.
One lawyer demanded that the judge remain just and fair and not be influenced by accusations made or reported by the media.
The judge reportedly retorted by asking whether the lawyer wanted him to take an oath or sign a written guarantee.
Emotions seemed to run high, and the judge surely felt insulted.
The lawyers also claimed that much evidence had not been reviewed. They requested that the judge temporarily suspend proceedings, but to no avail.
After the prosecutor finished reading the accusations, the presiding judge asked the accused if they were guilty, but their lawyers felt that the judge should not ask them about their guilt prior to questioning.
The prosecutor even wanted the lawyers to close their eyes and think about their ideals when they first started studying law.
The opening drama illustrated how the complications and emotions in this case far exceeded expectations.
The first issue at hand was whether the court hearing would be able to continue.
From a jurisprudential perspective, the president has immunity against criminal charges, but he has been implicated in the allegations in this trial.
The question is whether the trial against Wu violates the president's immunity.
The prosecutor and the judge must of course respond to the defense lawyers' claim that the review must be suspended since the proceedings are in violation of the Constitution.
The fact that the presiding judge and the prosecutor take the same stand on this issue also seems to be another source of conflict.
The presiding judge in particular must consider whether there will be any doubt about the verdict being constitutional.
Second, when it was decided that Wu would be prosecuted, the allegations regarding Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
Before the hearings began, however, it was discovered that false receipts and other irregularities had occurred in the reporting of Ma's fund expenditures.
The situation at the beginning of this review was very different from the situation at the time when the lawsuit was filed.
If this is a matter of karma, then the verdict in the special "state affairs" fund case will have a clear impact on the decision of whether or not the irregularities in the special allowance fund case should lead to prosecution and maybe even a guilty verdict.
The court faces another difficulty.
The case is highly politicized, and one could say it is closely intertwined with the ongoing political conflict, which means that it will be very difficult to depoliticize the review process and the verdict.
At the very least, the verdict will be unsatisfactory to one of the two political camps, and this poses a great challenge for the judiciary.
Judging from the first lady's poor condition at the initial court hearing, the court must improve.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (
It might have been an exaggeration to call the judge "inhumane," but media reports said: "When the doctors said Wu's systolic blood pressure had fallen to 50, the judge asked if she could return to the courtroom for further questioning within one or two hours if sent to the hospital. However, doctors said that she was not doing well, so they asked for her to be excused."
The judge seemed to be a bit too eager and showed a lack of understanding.
Wu's doctor said that her blood circulation was poor because of her paralysis from the waist down, and sitting still so long during the hearing had lowered her blood pressure even more.
This is a major lawsuit and the proceedings and verdict will have far-reaching consequences.
That means that the hearings must progress carefully without rushing things. This is not only necessary to reach a fair verdict, but also in taking Wu's health into consideration.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow at the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Perry Svensson
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused