On Friday, first lady Wu Shu-jen (
Wu's attendance conveyed a cooperativeness similar to when President Chen Shui-bian (
Of course, whether this cooperation will be deemed beneficial for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) will ultimately depend on the outcome of the trial. If Wu and the aides are found guilty of the crimes charged, none of this will make up for the injury suffered by the DPP.
The defense attorneys are disputing the very appropriateness of the trial. The plan is to challenge the constitutionality of the case from a number of standpoints. Above all, there is the issue of how Article 52 of the Constitution affectssthe proceedings.
The article says: "The President shall not, without having been recalled, or relieved of his functions, be liable to criminal prosecution unless he is charged with having committed an act of rebellion or treason."
During his presidency, Chen is immune from criminal prosecution. Perhaps the most controversial and complicated aspect of Wu's case is that if she or the aides were found guilty, the president himself would be implicated at the same time.
In other words it is Chen that is being tried in this case. After all, the acts in question are said by prosecutors to have been committed by Chen and Wu in concert.
In a political sense, Chen is the real defendant. If Wu and the aides are found guilty, it would be difficult for Chen to be found not guilty of the same crimes after his presidency ends.
On the other hand, even if Wu is found not guilty, Chen still faces the likelihood of criminal prosecution over his handling of the "state affairs fund" after his term is up.
In light of all this, is it the intention of the Constitution to indirectly prosecute the president this way before his term formally ends?
This is a question that deserves to be examined closely. If the legislative intent of the Constitution in providing criminal immunity to the president is to prevent obstruction of his presidential functions during his term, is that intent being usurped through the current prosecution?
On the other hand, the president's immunity also has a direct impact on the rights of the defendants in the present case -- namely, Wu and the three aides.
As someone who allegedly played the key role in the acts in question, Chen's testimony would have a serious impact on the ability of the court to hear and review all relevant facts before entering a verdict.
According to the prosecutors, Chen had agreed to be questioned by them twice previously. But will Chen agree to do so again if the court feels that it is necessary?
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers