A number of conclusions can be drawn about the results of mayoral elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung:
First, in spite of the fact that Taiwan is a young and fragile democracy, the elections went well, and show a maturing of Taiwan. Democracy is working in spite of the obstructionist tactics by extreme elements in the old Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP).
Second, the two main political parties held on to their power bases, while the smaller parties lost ground and seem increasingly marginalized.
Third, the political troubles surrounding President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) -- and to a lesser extent Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) -- due to corruption allegations connected with special funds, appear not to have influenced the outcome to any considerable extent.
Fourth, since the Democratic Progressive Party did better than expected, the main leaders in the party will continue in their respective positions, which will bring stability to the political landscape.
Fifth, the departure of PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) from the political scene will enable KMT Chairman Ma to move forward with sensitive issues such as the budget for the US arms sales to Taiwan, which had been blocked in the Legislative Yuan due to obstruction from Soong.
It remains to be seen though if Ma is willing to show leadership on this issue.?
Gerrit van der Wees
Washington
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US