Once again, another election is upon us. If you live in Taipei, you do not need to know anything about elections to understand this, for the streets, buildings and parks of the city are filled with every kind of campaign advertising you can imagine.
These ads are all the same. They show a picture of the candidate in some joyous or thought- ful pose, have their names written in large, bold characters, show their ballot number (just in case you forget their name) and often offer some short, witty and utterly forgettable phrase in Chinese that says little. Sadly, once elected our papers become inundated with their same friendly-yet-thoughtful poses, speaking a lot, yet still saying surprisingly little.
The worst thing about these ads is the saturation in which they are found. The campaign flags are the worst. They are placed only centimeters apart along the city's streets and parks and are somewhat of an eyesore.
The logic to this fails me. I cannot imagine anybody saying, "I don't know much about politics, but this guy has enough campaign flags along the road that I could walk from my home to the MRT on a rainy day without getting my hair wet, so I think I will vote for him."
Pan-blue voters are going to vote pan-blue, and pan-green voters are going to vote pan-green. More moderate voters, which are the only ones a campaign could really sway, are going to roll their eyes and hope for more moderation from their candidates. So putting up literally thousands of advertisements does little.
Don't get me wrong. I think it is a fine thing that people in Taiwan can now vote freely; it is sadly somewhat of a rarity to be able to do so in Asia. However, there needs to be a little tact and self control in how these campaigns are run. There should be enough advertisements that the average citizen can think, "Well, look. Mr Wang is running for City Counselor. Fascinating," and then be able to go on with his day in peace.
The way it is now, people on the streets are constantly bombarded by a campaign that serves only to annoy.
The greatest tragedy about it all is that these candidates claim to care so much about this city, yet are willing to desecrate it using political tactics that do little to serve their purposes.
It would serve the candidates and, most importantly, the citizens of Taipei if the city government would establish zoning laws about where candidates can and cannot place their ads.
This would serve the candidates and the party they represent by saving them literally millions of dollars in campaign expenses. And the law would not be too difficult to enforce since candidates for opposing parties often hold press conferences decrying even the smallest infraction of the law by their rivals.
In conclusion, if someone wants to run for office, fine. But they should not do so at the expense of the city's beauty or its citizens' well-being.
Daniel Mojahedi
Taipei
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past