Once again, another election is upon us. If you live in Taipei, you do not need to know anything about elections to understand this, for the streets, buildings and parks of the city are filled with every kind of campaign advertising you can imagine.
These ads are all the same. They show a picture of the candidate in some joyous or thought- ful pose, have their names written in large, bold characters, show their ballot number (just in case you forget their name) and often offer some short, witty and utterly forgettable phrase in Chinese that says little. Sadly, once elected our papers become inundated with their same friendly-yet-thoughtful poses, speaking a lot, yet still saying surprisingly little.
The worst thing about these ads is the saturation in which they are found. The campaign flags are the worst. They are placed only centimeters apart along the city's streets and parks and are somewhat of an eyesore.
The logic to this fails me. I cannot imagine anybody saying, "I don't know much about politics, but this guy has enough campaign flags along the road that I could walk from my home to the MRT on a rainy day without getting my hair wet, so I think I will vote for him."
Pan-blue voters are going to vote pan-blue, and pan-green voters are going to vote pan-green. More moderate voters, which are the only ones a campaign could really sway, are going to roll their eyes and hope for more moderation from their candidates. So putting up literally thousands of advertisements does little.
Don't get me wrong. I think it is a fine thing that people in Taiwan can now vote freely; it is sadly somewhat of a rarity to be able to do so in Asia. However, there needs to be a little tact and self control in how these campaigns are run. There should be enough advertisements that the average citizen can think, "Well, look. Mr Wang is running for City Counselor. Fascinating," and then be able to go on with his day in peace.
The way it is now, people on the streets are constantly bombarded by a campaign that serves only to annoy.
The greatest tragedy about it all is that these candidates claim to care so much about this city, yet are willing to desecrate it using political tactics that do little to serve their purposes.
It would serve the candidates and, most importantly, the citizens of Taipei if the city government would establish zoning laws about where candidates can and cannot place their ads.
This would serve the candidates and the party they represent by saving them literally millions of dollars in campaign expenses. And the law would not be too difficult to enforce since candidates for opposing parties often hold press conferences decrying even the smallest infraction of the law by their rivals.
In conclusion, if someone wants to run for office, fine. But they should not do so at the expense of the city's beauty or its citizens' well-being.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose