Whether or not Taipei Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Following the revelations of Ma's mayoral fund, it has emerged that these special accounts have been available to some 6,500 local government officials since the 1950s.
With details of these funds now emerging -- along with earlier exposure of the special 18 percent preferential interest rate for pensions enjoyed by retired teachers, soldiers and civil servants; the five-month salary payment given to certain government workers for funeral expenses; and other things such as tax-free earnings for military staff and civil servants -- the public is slowly but surely becoming aware of how recklessly large amounts of their tax dollars have been misused over the years.
Ma's claim that remitting half of the special mayoral fund into his personal bank account was "normal" and lawful just goes to highlight the lack of oversight for public money that has prevailed and how shady practices have become institutionalized.
The whole government system is littered with such examples. But should we really be surprised?
After all, the KMT -- the party that created Taiwan's political system -- has long been a party driven by nepotism and corruption.
Historians note that a failure to combat corruption was one of the main reasons why Chiang Kai-shek's (
And rampant corruption is why, after just 18 months of KMT rule under executive administrator Chen Yi (
The KMT's system of patronage was imported wholesale from China along with the Nationalist government and allowed to flourish during its five decades of party-state rule.
But it was done with good reason: the KMT needed to foster a culture of party loyalty to help preserve its rule on Taiwan.
And it was this need that led to the creation of such generous benefits for anybody that was willing to serve and remain faithful to the party.
Under a system like this, is it any wonder that career politicians like former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
Ironically, it is now time to thank the KMT and the pan-blue camp, because their ceaseless and frenzied attempts to harm the president and win back power have inadvertently opened a can of worms that will possibly help to bring crashing down the flawed system that it profited from for five decades.
The fallout from the mayoral and presidential fund scandals is now threatening to spread, affecting officials past and present from both sides of the political divide, and hopefully bringing an end to yet another unwelcome relic of the party-state era.
But the most disappointing aspect of the whole episode is the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) role in bringing this about.
After years of hounding the KMT, accusing it of corruption and amassing stolen assets, the DPP seemed content after coming to power to sit back and enjoy the spoils of its victory instead of getting to work and rectifying all that was wrong with the rotten system it inherited.
That inactivity could now cost the party dearly.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS