If anyone can help Taiwan enter the WHO under observer status, it's going to be Margaret Chan (
Taiwanese health officials are upbeat about the prospects and pleased with the Hong Kong doctor's appointment.
"As director of Hong Kong's health department during the 2003 SARS epidemic, Chan will have a better understanding of Taiwan's public health issues and its need to be included in the international health community," said Peter Chang (張武修), head of Department of Health's Bureau of International Cooperation.
In addition, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs hopes Chan will put aside her political stance as a citizen of China and work to help Taiwan become a WHO observer.
"More and more members of the WHO have realized the importance and necessity of [our] participation in [WHO], so we expect Chan will stick to the spirit of the WHO which aims to provide good health care to all global citizens and not exclude the people of Taiwan any longer," the ministry said.
Mainland Affairs Council Chairman Joseph Wu (
"Both Hong Kong and Taiwan were affected by SARS in 2003. Since Chan is from Hong Kong, she should understand Taiwan's wish to join the WHO," he said.
However, China remains firm in its position that Taiwan has no right to join the WHO. "Our stance is clear," Jiang Yu (姜瑜), a spokeswoman for China's Foreign Ministry told reporters in Beijing after Chan's appointment was made public. "WHO is made up of sovereign states, so as a part of China, Taiwan has no right to join. This is not a decision that can be made by [Chan] alone."
Taiwan's application to join the WHO under observer status has been shot down for 10 consecutive years in the face of Chinese pressure. Taiwan has not been a member of the WHO since the Republic of China withdrew from the the UN in 1979.
Chan is now in a position to help Taiwan join WHO in some capacity, according to observers. But will she? Can she?
It's not going to be easy, as previous attempts have shown. The battle continues, and Taiwan will make a new try next year.
While the WHO can't continue to ignore the rights to basic health of Taiwan's 23 million people, justice in Geneva won't come easily or quickly, although now there's more hope with Chan.
The preamble to the WHO Constitution states: "The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being, without distinction to race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition."
It makes perfect sense therefore for Taiwan to be admitted to the world body, and the sooner the better. Those who conspire to keep Taiwan out of the WHO are working against the very spirit of the preamble itself.
If other entities such as the Vatican, the Palestinian Authority and the Red Cross can hold WHO, observer status, certainly there should be a place at the table for Taiwan's representatives, too.
Diseases recognize no boundaries, as SARS and bird flu shows. Taiwan's status as a WHO observer would not involve the sovereignty dispute with China, nor would it challenge Beijing's existing status within the WHO.
Will next year's news reports from Geneva repeat the same refrain -- that Taiwan's bid was thwarted once again after the WHO general commission decided against putting the motion on its agenda?
Chan has a chance to show her mettle. She should give Taiwan its proper place in the WHO.
Dan Bloom is a freelance writer in Taiwan.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
RSS