For those present it was a memorable night. On March 17, 2000, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was holding its election-eve rally in support of its presidential candidate Chen Shui-bian (
The location was the Zhongshan Soccer Stadium in Taipei. Behind the stage was a stand full of the party faithful and representatives of civic organizations. One by one, these groups ran on stage to pump up the crowd, witnessed by a VIP group at the front that included foreign media and academics.
A number of celebrities took the stage, carefully chosen for their appeal across the ethnic divide. Yang Chuan-kuang (
As interminable as election rallies can be, this one was something special, and a surprise had been promised to finish the night.
That surprise was a video endorsement by Academia Sinica president Lee Yuan-tseh (
The choice was hardly difficult. Of Chen's two main opponents, one was a man who in most countries would already have found himself in jail; the other was a man who in most countries would be denounced as unfit for high office, if not as a traitor.
Even so, Lee's support seemed to lend Chen a last boost in credibility -- 12 hours before voting stations opened. Lee's injection into the campaign has since been mythologized as significant, if not decisive.
In retrospect it is unclear that Lee's support affected the result, as close as it was. But Lee's reputation was enhanced -- not so much as a kingmaker as a person of wisdom who had the needs of the average Taiwanese in mind as much as those of the ruling elite or the academic world.
His role in the Chen administration therefore became more influential as he attempted to ease cross-strait tensions and push for other reforms.
Six-and-a-half years later and the cycle of support and abandonment is complete. Lee, no longer head of Academia Sinica, has urged Chen to resign over the scandals besetting the Presidential Office.
For Chen, though painful, Lee's appeal is merely one of a series of personal blows and can therefore be placed in some sort of perspective.
But Chen's constitutional position remains unchanged, and assuming he survives the third recall motion, his decision to stay or step down should be made with the interests of the nation in mind, not the degree of regard in which he is held by a scientist, even one as venerable as Lee.
Lee's currency as a moral arbiter has also been compromised -- not by any error of commission on his part, but by the fact that his political agenda was never more than half-fulfilled, notably the naive assumption that goodwill toward Beijing would have any meaningful effect.
There is something rather tragic about the Chen-Lee relationship. Chen has been stained by serving his politically fractured country, while Lee's reputation -- for most people -- has only been enhanced. It is hoped that Lee, as he attends his overseas conference with his comfortable scientist's aura, will understand this, and especially that he only ever gained from his association with the president.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS