China's weekend summit with Africa marked a milestone in its global emergence, giving it more leverage against the West and setting it up for more oil and other trade deals, analysts said yesterday.
The turnout for the two-day summit in Beijing that ended on Sunday spoke volumes. Delegations from 48 African nations attended, including 41 heads of state or government -- an illustration of Beijing's growing clout.
"[China] gave a party and everybody came. It's a big deal," said David Zweig, an expert on Chinese foreign policy at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
China's state press wasted no time trumpeting the summit as a "milestone."
"It consolidated the traditional friendship between Chinese and African people [and] injected new energy into China-Africa cooperation," an editorial in the People's Daily said yesterday.
China has faced accusations that it worsens repression and human rights abuses in Africa through support for countries such as Sudan and Zimbabwe in a cynical drive to increase access to African oil and other resources.
There has also been criticism that Beijing undermines the current Western policy of denying aid to countries with repressive governments.
But China shrugged off those claims during the summit and served notice it would continue to challenge the Western diplomatic and economic strategies for Africa.
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
China also said it would double aid by 2009 and would offer US$5 billion in loans and credit to African countries.
And unlike the approach from the US and institutions such as the IMF, the offers came with no democracy or human rights strings attached, freeing up nations such as Sudan to get easy money.
"Now, some countries can get aid and investment without improving on [human rights and democracy] issues. This is another challenge to the Western countries," said Yen Chen-shen (嚴震生), a researcher at Taiwan's Institute of International Relations.
China sweetened the diplomatic deal even further with a US$1.9 billion package of trade and investment deals in Africa.
They included an aluminum production plant in Egypt worth US$938 million, a US$300 million contract for Chinese firms to upgrade a highway in Nigeria, a US$200 million copper project in Zambia, and other deals with Sudan, South Africa, Kenya, Cape Verde and Ghana.
Contrary to expectations, no major African energy deals were announced during the summit, but the goodwill engendered here will no doubt lead to greater Chinese access to African energy resources, Yen said.
"China needs energy from Africa. It needs to import a lot of oil nowadays since its economy is growing so fast, and China can get it from African countries through the summit," he said.
Turning Western criticism around, China sought to seize the moral high ground by calling in a joint communique for greater investment and aid from rich nations to help poor African countries, regardless of who governs them.
"They don't talk about it but in some way they are challenging the moral position of the IMF and the United States on conditional aid. I think this is very important for the Chinese," Zweig said.
Africa was high on China's agenda during the Cold War, when Beijing was diplomatically isolated and desperate to expand its sphere of influence.
That waned beginning in the 1980s, Zweig said, as the need for technology and capital prompted China to reach out to the West and Japan.
But with those relationships now quite solid, China sees a resumption of its traditionally strong African ties as further bolstering its international clout.
"I think it's significant. It's the biggest event in terms of China refocusing its attention on the developing world," Zweig said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US