Comments by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice last week regarding the US' commitment to help Taiwan defend itself were nothing new. However, they came in the wake of regional tension over the nuclear test by North Korea and in response to questions over Taiwan's role in international efforts to deal with the crisis.
Most people in Taiwan do not see the nuclear test as something which will have an immediate effect on their lives. Nevertheless, if the crisis continues to escalate -- which at this point seems inevitable -- Taiwan cannot possibly stay clear out of it.
Leaving aside the immediate issue of potential environmental contamination caused by further nuclear tests or indeed a nuclear conflict, for the simple reason that China plays a key role in the North Korean crisis, any resulting shift or instability in the regional balance of power will inevitably affect the cross-strait relationship.
Since Taiwan is neither a member of the UN nor was invited to participate in the six-party talks on the issue, the nation is not expected to have a say on how the crisis should be managed. While many may decry the unfairness of this, it is a political reality that is not likely to change.
Under the circumstances, Rice's statement on the US' commitment to help Taiwan defend itself should help allay the sense of helplessness felt by some Taiwanese in the aftermath of the nuclear test.
On the other hand, it just so happens that Rice's comments were made at around the same time that the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission -- a US government advisory panel -- was getting ready to approve a report that highlights China's advanced military capabilities.
The report depicted Taiwan as becoming increasingly dependent on the US to deter Chinese aggression and to intervene should such aggression turn to use of force.
The situations described in the report are a cause for concern, especially in light of the fact that it also described a "window of vulnerability" from 2008 to 2015 in the military capability of Washington to intervene in the event of any cross-strait military crisis.
However, the politicians and people of Taiwan seemingly remain largely indifferent to world events -- not only with respect to the North Korean crisis but also to the implications of the US "window of vulnerability" and the increasing military threat posed by China.
Otherwise, it is hard to understand why pan-blue lawmakers, especially Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, decided to break their promise -- which was made in a meeting organized by Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
The supplemental budget was the product of a compromise between the ruling and opposition camps to begin with, approving greatly reduced funds in comparison with the funding initially requested for the arms procurement program.
In light of these events, the arms bill is likely to remain a hostage of the deadlocked legislature. The likelihood of the nation becoming less reliant on US protection is remote.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas