Does anyone really know the real reason behind Shih Ming-teh's (
Can it be that he wants to expand his 15 minutes of fame and get back into the political spotlight?
By tossing out the obvious campaign statement that the reason behind Shih's campaign to oust the president is to clean up the current Taiwanese government (which is already in a weak position), both the pan-green and the pan-blue camps need to start worrying about the possible effects that such an explosive personality as Shih might have on their campaigns to win the 2008 presidential election.
The campaign adviser for KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
We all know that Shih's current campaign to oust the president will not succeed in its stated purpose. Chen is not going to step down over what remain as allegations, nor should he, as the popularly elected leader of Taiwan for the past six years.
We also all know that Shih is not likely to give up the public spotlight that has earned him enough political credit to work in his favor for his future. So what will be the next step for Shih?
There are three possible options: Shih joining the pan-blue camp and possibly joining Ma's 2008 ticket; Shih running for a legislative seat; or Shih running as an independent in the 2008 presidential election.
Although Shih has a very good chance of winning a legislative seat, his influence would be limited since he does not belong in either the pan-blue or pan-green camps.
This is also why Shih will not join the pan-blue camp because for that camp, red is still not blue.
So if Shih actually wants to exert maximum influence and extend his 15 minutes of fame, running as an independent in the 2008 president election is his most viable option.
Though he probably won't win the election, he will be able to leverage his advantages and ask those who might need him to step down for a position in power.
Even a failed presidential run would still be more impressive than any of his previous political stunts.
This brings the obvious question of who would Shih hurt more in a three-way race for the presidency.
Shih will only affect those in the middle of the road -- from the light green to the light blue -- for those with dark hues of green or blue have already cast their vote in their hearts and cannot be influenced otherwise.
As for a bid to win the presidential election, both the pan-blue and pan-green camps need to maximize their number of uncommitted (light blue-green) voters in order to gain large enough a percentage to win the election.
This in turn hurts Ma the most as he has been and still is considered the frontrunner to win the next presidential election because of his appeal to moderate uncommitted voters in Taiwan.
Joshua Chengyung Fu
Taipei
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past