Does anyone really know the real reason behind Shih Ming-teh's (
Can it be that he wants to expand his 15 minutes of fame and get back into the political spotlight?
By tossing out the obvious campaign statement that the reason behind Shih's campaign to oust the president is to clean up the current Taiwanese government (which is already in a weak position), both the pan-green and the pan-blue camps need to start worrying about the possible effects that such an explosive personality as Shih might have on their campaigns to win the 2008 presidential election.
The campaign adviser for KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
We all know that Shih's current campaign to oust the president will not succeed in its stated purpose. Chen is not going to step down over what remain as allegations, nor should he, as the popularly elected leader of Taiwan for the past six years.
We also all know that Shih is not likely to give up the public spotlight that has earned him enough political credit to work in his favor for his future. So what will be the next step for Shih?
There are three possible options: Shih joining the pan-blue camp and possibly joining Ma's 2008 ticket; Shih running for a legislative seat; or Shih running as an independent in the 2008 presidential election.
Although Shih has a very good chance of winning a legislative seat, his influence would be limited since he does not belong in either the pan-blue or pan-green camps.
This is also why Shih will not join the pan-blue camp because for that camp, red is still not blue.
So if Shih actually wants to exert maximum influence and extend his 15 minutes of fame, running as an independent in the 2008 president election is his most viable option.
Though he probably won't win the election, he will be able to leverage his advantages and ask those who might need him to step down for a position in power.
Even a failed presidential run would still be more impressive than any of his previous political stunts.
This brings the obvious question of who would Shih hurt more in a three-way race for the presidency.
Shih will only affect those in the middle of the road -- from the light green to the light blue -- for those with dark hues of green or blue have already cast their vote in their hearts and cannot be influenced otherwise.
As for a bid to win the presidential election, both the pan-blue and pan-green camps need to maximize their number of uncommitted (light blue-green) voters in order to gain large enough a percentage to win the election.
This in turn hurts Ma the most as he has been and still is considered the frontrunner to win the next presidential election because of his appeal to moderate uncommitted voters in Taiwan.
Joshua Chengyung Fu
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers