Despite strong international criticism, North Korea stormed ahead with its first nuclear test on Monday. US President George W. Bush condemned the test as a provocation of the rest of the world and a threat to international peace and security.
He conferred with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who had just left on a visit to China and South Korea, and the two leaders agreed to push for the UN' Security Council to take "resolute action."
North Korea's nuclear test is a serious blow to international stability in East Asia, and proves that China and the US' efforts to prevent North Korea from joining the nuclear club have been massive failures. The international community originally had high hopes that the six-party talks would persuade North Korea to give up its nuclear aspirations. However, its test has thoroughly proven the ineffectiveness of Beijing's effort to be a leader in international policy, and destroyed any credibility it had as a reliable mediator.
Will Beijing support Japan and the US' proposal for the Security Council to impose tougher sanctions? China sees North Korea as an important buffer country, and believes that it must under no circumstances lose this vital strategic shield. It therefore isn't willing to put pressure on North Korea or do anything that might usher the collapse of Kim Jong-il's regime.
But China has another serious consideration. If the regime is toppled, it will have millions of North Korean refugees pouring across its border, an outcome it is loathe to see. So Beijing only pays lip service to criticizing North Korea for its nuclear test, reiterating its tired old refrain that "North Korea should respect its promise not to go nuclear, suspend all activities that could lead to a worsening of the situation, and return to the six-party talks."
The US' top concern, on the other hand, is that North Korea could develop the ability to attack the US with nuclear weapons and long-range missiles. This week's test proves that the "no war, but no peace either" tactic Bush has adopted over the past six years has been a complete failure. Furthermore, the Bush administration's reliance on China to act as moderator for the six-party talks has been a colossal strategic failure. It is therefore time for a policy reassessment.
If the US isn't capable of deterring North Korea from pursuing its nuclear strategy, Iran will make careful note and not hesitate to speed up its own nuclear weapons program. Other Middle Eastern countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt, will also come to believe that the US and Western Europe's non-proliferation controls are ineffective, and that they must also defend themselves by developing nuclear weapons. This will be an enormous blow to the international community, and so the US must take resolute action.
North Korea will pay no attention to the rest of the world and continue to boost the strength of its nuclear weapons because its leaders believe they are needed to safeguard the nation's security, as well as the survival of Kim Jong-il's personal power. They don't believe that China or Russia are real friends either, and that nuclear weapons are their last resort for defending the country.
North Korea's policy of brinkmanship has forced Japan to once again consider amending its pacifist constitution and build up its military. It also has to decide whether or not it wants to develop its own nuclear weapons.
North Korea has strengthened Abe's position. He has long held that Japan should amend its 1947 Constitution so that military forces can fight alongside allies overseas. The draft of the revised Constitution will maintain Japan's commitment to peace, but it will also allow for Japan to quicken its military buildup and become a normal country.
Parris Chang is a former deputy secretary-general of the National Security Council.
Translated by Marc Langer
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers