Popular movements serve a necessary function in a democracy by constantly renewing and revitalizing the government. However, we should be more cautious about mass movements that have a divisive effect.
Demonstrations between opposing groups can only harden their resistance to one another and cannot resolve the issue that separates them. Therefore, I call for an end to antagonism between the various pro and anti-President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) movements and an immediate beginning of dialogue and reconciliation among all Taiwanese.
Civil society has long been impinged upon by politics. Fierce opposition between political parties has entangled society in a constant battle that only has one purpose: to defeat the other side. This behavior is more representative of groups of animals in which both sides are caught in an eternal cycle of fighting and dying, winning and losing, without ever questioning whether they are right or wrong. Slowly, society's system of values collapses. This is the main factor in our moral decline.
Most importantly, a society constantly at odds with itself is incapable of developing into a civilized community because it is forever caught up in barbarism and violence. Without an end to strife and hostility, a civilized society is unattainable. True social reform is impossible as well, much less the fulfillment of any long-term plan.
To escape this, the citizenry must step into the public arena and open up dialogue, find common ground and forge an agreement on what kind of political structure they want.
Deadlocks are essentially between society and the government, not within society itself. This is the fundamental principle of democratic governance. But in Taiwan, the divisions that political society have created within civil society have led to turmoil which in turn allows the government to control it. This is the biggest problem facing Taiwan's civil society and democratic governance.
Therefore I call on both sides to engage in dialogue and begin to listen to each other. Chen's supporters do not identify with Chen as much as they seem to do. They are motivated by their memories of the past crimes of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and are unwilling to let the KMT benefit from Chen being toppled.
This may just be a "historical matter" to some, but it is still very much alive within the hearts of many Taiwanese. I believe that only by addressing today's political dispute in its full historical context can it be resolved.
The Million Voices Against Corruption initiated by former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) started off as a movement purely concerned with Taiwan's constitutional government and was free from any overt involvement by political parties. However, it inevitably settled into the same old lines of confrontation.
The campaign provoked a fierce reaction as it traveled to Taiwan's central and southern regions, demonstrating just how deep-rooted and serious these "historical matters" are to many people. This is an important lesson for all Taiwanese to study, including those in the anti-Chen camp.
Therefore I appeal to all anti-Chen demonstrators to face Taiwan's past and seek to promote dialogue with pro-Chen demonstrators. While you demand that Chen bear his political responsibilities, also demand that the KMT accept its historical responsibilities.
Join together and commit to resolving political conflict and the historical issues behind it. In this regard Chen might not just be a source of conflict, but also a turning point for the nation. We should all look at today's problems from this kind of positive angle.
Today, the burden of the KMT's past mistakes fall on the Mainlanders. On the other hand, Chen's errors are thrust upon all Taiwanese, especially non-Mainlanders. This is absolutely unfair. I ask all Taiwanese to do away with their animosity, talk to one another and seek reconciliation. Agree to work toward a civilized society and monitor the government instead of letting yourselves be distracted by it. Citizens in a democratic society do not allow themselves to be acted upon, but take the initiative themselves.
Politicians shouldn't use divisive issues of nationality, independence/unification, party affiliation or history for personal aims. Taiwanese should see through the manipulation of politicians and decide the truth for themselves.
I believe that only through dialogue, understanding and reconciliation will we be able to understand the true nature of these issues. Then after we draw up a social contract and establish responsible government, these problems will be resolved.
It doesn't matter whether we face the KMT's past errors, the DPP's current failings or the problems of any future party. Only by uniting together to monitor the government can a democratic government function normally and give Taiwan a future.
Lii Ding-tsann is a professor in the Graduate School of Sociology at National Tsing-hua University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US