The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) celebrated its 20th anniversary last Saturday, with a much weaker power base compared with six years ago and its reformist image has been dealt a serious blow by the corruption scandal surrounding the first family. Worst of all, the DPP, which purports to uphold democracy and progress, has debased itself by going all out to protect President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
In response to the campaign against the president, the DPP has urged the public to wait patiently for a judicial ruling. While this sounds reasonable, one should not rule out the possibility of Chen or his family being found guilty once all judicial proceedings are completed. That being the case, why is the party aggressively attacking the president's enemies, linking his struggle to the protection of democracy, the localized regime and even Taiwan, instead of patiently waiting for a judicial ruling?
The DPP belongs to all party members, not just the president. Its primary task is to strengthen itself and pursue reforms to support the country's drive for normalization. If it abandons this and puts all its efforts into supporting Chen, won't its foundation collapse overnight when the political situation reverses and the country has a new president?
Factions were originally considered a key element of the DPP's structure because the balance among major factions prevented dominance by a single person. However, the DPP has chosen to dissolve the factions as a "cure-all" solution to improve its image. Without these strong dissenting voices within the party, it has sunk into a obedient tool to keep Chen in power.
Today, neither the president nor the party is concerned with the growing anti-Chen movement outside the DPP, because the Constitution gives him presidential immunity, allowing him shamelessly to stay in power. As for those who dare oppose him inside the party, his guardians can eliminate them without mercy. Unfortunately, the more the DPP consolidates its leadership, the lower its support ratings drop.
With Chen's second term ending in less than two years and his family and aides allegedly involved in high-profile corruption scandals, even if he were innocent, his leadership has already been hurt severely. Over the next 20 months, he will have to devote most of his energy to resisting the anti-Chen forces, leaving him powerless to resolve the political deadlock, implement major defense, diplomatic and cross-strait policies, or save the economy and the public livelihood. Taiwan's hands will be tied in the face of Beijing's united-front tactics and diplomatic siege.
Chen has greatly contributed to the DPP by realizing its dream of becoming the ruling party, but his administrative failure has also hurt the party. Today, its members should be pragmatic and recognize that loving Taiwan is more important than loving Chen, and that the post-Chen era has arrived. What it really shouldn't do is support him blindly. Rather, it should acknowledge his failings and ignore personal feelings to contain further political damage and rebuild the party's core values to attract voters. In other words, it should redeem itself.
What virtues and abilities do Chen and the DPP still have? Actually, the phenomenon of Chen's incredible popularity during the 2000 power transfer occurred only because he was entrusted with the sorrows and dreams of the Taiwanese. For the countless volunteers who have sacrificed themselves for the party, the DPP has a responsibility to repay them with a better administration. If it does not consider its long-term progress and vainly sacrifices itself for one person, it will betray the public's trust and lose its authority to represent localization forces.
Chang Chien-wu is a freelance commentator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95