Former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (
The group of demonstrators following Shih also say that Taiwan's economy is getting worse by the day, and that the people's living conditions are unbearable.
So are Taiwanese really in as much pain as the protesters say?
In order to find out the answer, we need to start off with an objective measure. The misery index created by Harvard economist Robert Barro is widely referred to by theorists and decision makers, and quantifies the quality of life of the "average" citizen.
The index combines unemployment and inflation -- as the two largest evils that threaten our economic wellbeing -- into one measure. The higher the misery index, the worse the people's overall living conditions.
To avoid long-term fluctuations that might bias the outcome, I use the most recent annual data to calculate the index. According to last year's official data, Taiwan's unemployment rate was 4.1 percent, and the inflation rate was 2.3 percent -- so Taiwan's misery index for last year was just 6.4 percent.
Are Shih and his followers right to be outraged by a misery index of 6.4 percent? To determine this, it is necessary to put Taiwan's indices side by side with those of other countries.
Brazil, Russia, India and China -- the "BRIC" economies -- are the leading examples of the world's late-developing or newly developed countries. A report by Goldman Sachs forecasts that, absent significant external shocks, the BRICs could be larger than the G6 nations in less than 40 years.
Based on official data for last year, the misery indices for the BRIC countries were: Brazil, 16.7 percent; Russia, 20.3 percent; India, 13.1 percent; and China, 13.4 percent. The last of these figures is quite rubbery, of course, as China's unemployment figures are based on urban surveys that do not account for rural joblessness. The real rate of unemployment could be as high as 20 percent.
So Taiwanese people can rest easy -- the people living in Brazil, Russia, India and China are a lot more miserable.
Since Taiwan is no longer a developing economy, we might want to compare its economic performance to that of the leading industrialized nations.
Take the largest economy in Europe, Germany. Surprisingly, the misery index of Germany, a fully developed economy, stood at 13.7 percent last year. Taiwan is out in front here.
What about the most powerful economy in the world, the US? The misery index of the US last year was 8.3 percent, and its index last month was 8.52 percent. Compared with Taiwan's 6.4 percent misery index, Taiwanese people again should be happier than US citizens.
What about regional comparisons? South Korea and Taiwan have similar trade and economic structures: Both countries are export dependent and approaching the global production frontier in technological terms. South Korea's misery index last year was 6.5 percent. It seems Taiwan is just a little less miserable than South Korea.
So are Taiwanese really in pain?
By and large, the people should not be in pain, but some certainly believe that they are.
Who has been trying to hypnotize these people? Why do they want to hypnotize them?
These anomalies require more research to resolve.
Darson Chiu is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US