The hallmark of this year's UN General Assembly debate has been the heavy anti-US tone from not only the country's rivals like Iran and Venezuela, but also a host of more moderate nations, a trend underscoring the US' troubled image in the world.
One after another, speakers in the General Assembly have lamented a world gone wrong -- renewed turmoil in the Middle East, a wider gap between rich and poor and anxiety about human rights abuses. While the US is not mentioned often, the reference is clear.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, for example, accused powerful nations of failing to solve the Middle East conflict, and argued a more equitable world is in rich nations' interests -- "as long as they do not make the mistake of ignoring the hideous cry of the excluded."
The US is blamed indirectly for not doing enough to stop Israel's war with Hezbollah in Lebanon, and is seen as spearheading the drive to curb Iran's nuclear program -- a campaign many nations believe is unnecessary. Countries lament the dominance of the UN Security Council and seek a greater UN role in the fight against terrorism.
"What it boils down to is a sense that the world doesn't believe that the [US] is acting in [the former's] interest anymore, whereas it used to at a much greater level," said Nancy Soderberg, a deputy US ambassador to the UN during the Clinton and Bush administrations.
The issue was thrust to the fore over the first few days of the General Assembly meeting with a string of speeches from leading critics of the US -- the presidents of Bolivia, Iran, Sudan and Venezuela -- who also riffed on their anger toward the US at lengthy news conferences.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez was the most bombastic, outstripping even Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by branding US President George W. Bush "the devil." What surprised many listeners was not necessarily the remarks, which were typical for Chavez, but the applause and titters of laughter that he received in response.
"A few years ago that would have been heard in stony silence,"Council of Europe Secretary-General Terry Davis said. "Not because people were afraid to show their agreement, but because they wouldn't have agreed with it. If I was working for the [US] government, that's what would worry me."
A June poll by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found that the US' image in 15 countries had dropped sharply this year. Less than a third of the people in Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan and Turkey had a favorable view of the US. According to that poll, the US' continuing involvement in Iraq was seen as a worse problem than Iran and its nuclear ambitions.
The anger toward the US seems itself to reflect a larger concern about the world. There is a sense that the Middle East turmoil mirrors a wider division between Muslims and the West. Poor nations seem to want a greater say in UN reform, where the US is only one of many nations pushing for change.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan acknowledged those divisions in his speech, saying they were so great they now "threaten the very notion of an international community, upon which this institution stands."
Annan's top deputy, Mark Malloch Brown, said the UN chief's staff had wrestled with what message to deliver and decided they must address the somber mood about the state of the world.
"The fact was you could not as secretary-general do anything else but observe that the world looks this year in a pretty sorry state," Malloch Brown said. "That judgment was much more endorsed by all the speeches that followed than we had expected."
US officials said they had taken note of the concern. They dismissed Chavez, who may also have had ulterior motives -- Venezuela is seeking a seat on the Security Council, and can gain political points by standing up to the US.
"I think that there's perhaps more of an inclination to vent those emotions here because they think they're more likely to get a positive reception," US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton said. "But I think that behavior doesn't do them any credit and it certainly doesn't benefit the [UN].''
Experts and diplomats say the trend is worrying particularly because it coincides with US rapprochement with the UN and the international community. Washington worked through the Security Council on Iran, North Korea and Lebanon, and dropped its opposition to a major council meeting on the Middle East peace process.
Bolton has also turned to the council as the best way to stop the violence in Darfur.
While Bush delivered plenty of criticism toward Iran and Syria in his own speech to the General Assembly, he omitted the questions about the relevance of the UN and toned down the doubts about whether it could meet the ideals of its founders.
On the first day of the General Assembly, Bush gave a toast in which he called Annan a "decent, honorable man" and thanked him for 10 years of service to "this important body."
That was the kind of praise Annan probably would have rather preferred to get during the height of the Iraq oil-for-food scandal, when the Bush administration kept silent in the face of calls from several US congressmen for his ouster.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China