The hallmark of this year's UN General Assembly debate has been the heavy anti-US tone from not only the country's rivals like Iran and Venezuela, but also a host of more moderate nations, a trend underscoring the US' troubled image in the world.
One after another, speakers in the General Assembly have lamented a world gone wrong -- renewed turmoil in the Middle East, a wider gap between rich and poor and anxiety about human rights abuses. While the US is not mentioned often, the reference is clear.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, for example, accused powerful nations of failing to solve the Middle East conflict, and argued a more equitable world is in rich nations' interests -- "as long as they do not make the mistake of ignoring the hideous cry of the excluded."
The US is blamed indirectly for not doing enough to stop Israel's war with Hezbollah in Lebanon, and is seen as spearheading the drive to curb Iran's nuclear program -- a campaign many nations believe is unnecessary. Countries lament the dominance of the UN Security Council and seek a greater UN role in the fight against terrorism.
"What it boils down to is a sense that the world doesn't believe that the [US] is acting in [the former's] interest anymore, whereas it used to at a much greater level," said Nancy Soderberg, a deputy US ambassador to the UN during the Clinton and Bush administrations.
The issue was thrust to the fore over the first few days of the General Assembly meeting with a string of speeches from leading critics of the US -- the presidents of Bolivia, Iran, Sudan and Venezuela -- who also riffed on their anger toward the US at lengthy news conferences.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez was the most bombastic, outstripping even Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by branding US President George W. Bush "the devil." What surprised many listeners was not necessarily the remarks, which were typical for Chavez, but the applause and titters of laughter that he received in response.
"A few years ago that would have been heard in stony silence,"Council of Europe Secretary-General Terry Davis said. "Not because people were afraid to show their agreement, but because they wouldn't have agreed with it. If I was working for the [US] government, that's what would worry me."
A June poll by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found that the US' image in 15 countries had dropped sharply this year. Less than a third of the people in Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan and Turkey had a favorable view of the US. According to that poll, the US' continuing involvement in Iraq was seen as a worse problem than Iran and its nuclear ambitions.
The anger toward the US seems itself to reflect a larger concern about the world. There is a sense that the Middle East turmoil mirrors a wider division between Muslims and the West. Poor nations seem to want a greater say in UN reform, where the US is only one of many nations pushing for change.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan acknowledged those divisions in his speech, saying they were so great they now "threaten the very notion of an international community, upon which this institution stands."
Annan's top deputy, Mark Malloch Brown, said the UN chief's staff had wrestled with what message to deliver and decided they must address the somber mood about the state of the world.
"The fact was you could not as secretary-general do anything else but observe that the world looks this year in a pretty sorry state," Malloch Brown said. "That judgment was much more endorsed by all the speeches that followed than we had expected."
US officials said they had taken note of the concern. They dismissed Chavez, who may also have had ulterior motives -- Venezuela is seeking a seat on the Security Council, and can gain political points by standing up to the US.
"I think that there's perhaps more of an inclination to vent those emotions here because they think they're more likely to get a positive reception," US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton said. "But I think that behavior doesn't do them any credit and it certainly doesn't benefit the [UN].''
Experts and diplomats say the trend is worrying particularly because it coincides with US rapprochement with the UN and the international community. Washington worked through the Security Council on Iran, North Korea and Lebanon, and dropped its opposition to a major council meeting on the Middle East peace process.
Bolton has also turned to the council as the best way to stop the violence in Darfur.
While Bush delivered plenty of criticism toward Iran and Syria in his own speech to the General Assembly, he omitted the questions about the relevance of the UN and toned down the doubts about whether it could meet the ideals of its founders.
On the first day of the General Assembly, Bush gave a toast in which he called Annan a "decent, honorable man" and thanked him for 10 years of service to "this important body."
That was the kind of praise Annan probably would have rather preferred to get during the height of the Iraq oil-for-food scandal, when the Bush administration kept silent in the face of calls from several US congressmen for his ouster.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US