The hallmark of this year's UN General Assembly debate has been the heavy anti-US tone from not only the country's rivals like Iran and Venezuela, but also a host of more moderate nations, a trend underscoring the US' troubled image in the world.
One after another, speakers in the General Assembly have lamented a world gone wrong -- renewed turmoil in the Middle East, a wider gap between rich and poor and anxiety about human rights abuses. While the US is not mentioned often, the reference is clear.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, for example, accused powerful nations of failing to solve the Middle East conflict, and argued a more equitable world is in rich nations' interests -- "as long as they do not make the mistake of ignoring the hideous cry of the excluded."
The US is blamed indirectly for not doing enough to stop Israel's war with Hezbollah in Lebanon, and is seen as spearheading the drive to curb Iran's nuclear program -- a campaign many nations believe is unnecessary. Countries lament the dominance of the UN Security Council and seek a greater UN role in the fight against terrorism.
"What it boils down to is a sense that the world doesn't believe that the [US] is acting in [the former's] interest anymore, whereas it used to at a much greater level," said Nancy Soderberg, a deputy US ambassador to the UN during the Clinton and Bush administrations.
The issue was thrust to the fore over the first few days of the General Assembly meeting with a string of speeches from leading critics of the US -- the presidents of Bolivia, Iran, Sudan and Venezuela -- who also riffed on their anger toward the US at lengthy news conferences.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez was the most bombastic, outstripping even Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by branding US President George W. Bush "the devil." What surprised many listeners was not necessarily the remarks, which were typical for Chavez, but the applause and titters of laughter that he received in response.
"A few years ago that would have been heard in stony silence,"Council of Europe Secretary-General Terry Davis said. "Not because people were afraid to show their agreement, but because they wouldn't have agreed with it. If I was working for the [US] government, that's what would worry me."
A June poll by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found that the US' image in 15 countries had dropped sharply this year. Less than a third of the people in Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan and Turkey had a favorable view of the US. According to that poll, the US' continuing involvement in Iraq was seen as a worse problem than Iran and its nuclear ambitions.
The anger toward the US seems itself to reflect a larger concern about the world. There is a sense that the Middle East turmoil mirrors a wider division between Muslims and the West. Poor nations seem to want a greater say in UN reform, where the US is only one of many nations pushing for change.
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan acknowledged those divisions in his speech, saying they were so great they now "threaten the very notion of an international community, upon which this institution stands."
Annan's top deputy, Mark Malloch Brown, said the UN chief's staff had wrestled with what message to deliver and decided they must address the somber mood about the state of the world.
"The fact was you could not as secretary-general do anything else but observe that the world looks this year in a pretty sorry state," Malloch Brown said. "That judgment was much more endorsed by all the speeches that followed than we had expected."
US officials said they had taken note of the concern. They dismissed Chavez, who may also have had ulterior motives -- Venezuela is seeking a seat on the Security Council, and can gain political points by standing up to the US.
"I think that there's perhaps more of an inclination to vent those emotions here because they think they're more likely to get a positive reception," US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton said. "But I think that behavior doesn't do them any credit and it certainly doesn't benefit the [UN].''
Experts and diplomats say the trend is worrying particularly because it coincides with US rapprochement with the UN and the international community. Washington worked through the Security Council on Iran, North Korea and Lebanon, and dropped its opposition to a major council meeting on the Middle East peace process.
Bolton has also turned to the council as the best way to stop the violence in Darfur.
While Bush delivered plenty of criticism toward Iran and Syria in his own speech to the General Assembly, he omitted the questions about the relevance of the UN and toned down the doubts about whether it could meet the ideals of its founders.
On the first day of the General Assembly, Bush gave a toast in which he called Annan a "decent, honorable man" and thanked him for 10 years of service to "this important body."
That was the kind of praise Annan probably would have rather preferred to get during the height of the Iraq oil-for-food scandal, when the Bush administration kept silent in the face of calls from several US congressmen for his ouster.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers