Australia says it is not the sheriff of the South Pacific, but complaints over a rebel jailbreak in East Timor and riots in the Solomon Islands are putting its new activist foreign policy to the test.
In both countries Australia has troops or police on the ground in a peacekeeping role and in both cases it has been blamed for failures that plunged them deeper into crisis.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard has reacted angrily to the charges, but analysts said Wednesday he should expect increasing criticism as he follows through with the "Howard doctrine" of greater intervention in the region.
"This is part of growing up in foreign policy terms and you've got to cop the flak sometimes, that's just one of the costs," said Alan Dupont, a security analyst at the University of Sydney.
"One of the problems in taking a more active approach under the so-called Howard doctrine is we are going to suffer the consequences every time something goes wrong in one of these states and it's difficult to get any kudos," he said.
Howard has made it clear that he believes Australia, as the most powerful country in a region of tiny and impoverished island nations, has a responsibility to help them maintain stability.
He announced last month that the army would be boosted by 2,600 troops and the federal police force by 400 to cope with increasing international deployments.
But he rejected suggestions that he aspired to be the region's sheriff.
"Can I just place on the record my rejection of the proposition that Australia has become the sheriff of the Pacific," he told reporters.
On Wednesday, however, a clearly annoyed Howard said he would not accept Solomons Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare's expulsion of Canberra's high commissioner over an inquiry into rioting and for meddling in internal politics.
"We don't accept for a moment the expulsion of our high commissioner Patrick Cole," Howard told national radio, setting the stage for a diplomatic showdown.
"He was doing the right thing, he was representing the interests of Australia, he was concerned about corruption in the Solomon Islands," he said.
Howard's government has indicated it is concerned that the Solomons-appointed inquiry into the April riots would be used to put the blame on Australian police and exonerate two of Sogavare's political colleagues.
The Solomons government has suggested that the firing of tear gas at a political protest sparked the riots which led to the capital Honiara being trashed by rampaging mobs.
"There's a long-standing history of corruption and incompetence on the part of the government there and there has been a tendency to blame everybody but themselves for their problems," said Deakin University analyst Damien Kingsbury. "The reality is if Australia does not assist, many of these places would be in dire straits."
Australia was also blamed by the East Timorese Prime Minister Ramos Horta for a jailbreak last month that saw rebel military officer Alfredo Reinado walk out of prison with 56 others.
Howard and Foreign Minister Alexander Downer strenuously denied the charge, saying responsibility for prison security was in the hands of the East Timorese.
But Dupont said there was an element of joint responsibility for what he called "the great escape."
"I think that the security provided by the East Timorese was lax and the New Zealand and Australian security forces should have been a bit more alert to what might happen," he said.
Dupont said, however, that Australia was trying to be an honest broker in implementing the policy outlined by Howard three years ago to help stabilize some of the weak states in the region.
He said Australia's more active approach was driven by the need to prevent states failing, which could then create security problems, as well as a humanitarian obligation.
He dismissed as "a nonsense" the favorite taunt of former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad that Australia was simply US President George W. Bush's "deputy sheriff" in the region.
"This is our backyard. If we had no relation with the US, we would be doing the same. We believe as the major power in the region that we have an obligation," Dupont said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers