A Chinese joke goes, "you won't know how low your government post is until you are in Beijing, you won't know how poor you are until you are in Shanghai and you won't know how unhealthy you are until you are in Hainan." To this one can now add: "You won't know that the Cultural Revolution is still going on until you are in Taiwan." Although the Cultural Revolution was launched by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and there is no Mao here, after observing the current situation, I tend to agree.
Mao launched the Cultural Revolution in the name of culture, but it was in fact aimed at toppling then Chinese president Liu Shaoqi (
Mao started the Cultural Revolution through government-controlled publications -- the People's Daily, the People's Liberation Daily and Hongqi Magazine. Their editorials, special reports and articles by members of the "proletarian headquarters" moulded public opinion. After the "red shock wave" was initiated, the nation moved in unison. Those who were named, were immediately criticized and denounced at public meetings. To protect themselves, officials at lower party levels disclosed information about people in their area or departments to label them all "monsters and demons."
These people -- referred to as the "five black classes," later expanded to eight -- were not arrested. Rather, they were exposed by the dictatorship of the masses and the "five red classes." They were paraded through the streets to be reproached, beaten and spat on. At the time, doctors would ask about one's background, and if there was any connectiontto someone in the five black classes, treatment was refused. China was immersed in a red terror.
The CCP spread slogans to encourage violence against "bad" people. The struggle aggravated social division, almost paralyzed the government and brought the economy to the brink of collapse.
After Mao seized power and successfully implemented the "grand revolutionary coalition," neither side approved of people from the other side. As a result, one faction emerged and took power -- still requiring approval from above -- while the five black categories were slowly rehabilitated.
Taiwan's culture of disclosure is similar to the Cultural Revolution's attitude to "question and attack everything." Taiwan's pro-independence forces are now being beaten and forced to apologize just like the "five black classes." Where is the democracy in that? In fact, China is the one manipulating this populism. Although there is no Mao here, China's influence is everywhere.
Finding a politician like Shih Ming-teh (施明德) who has never been to China is not easy. Unfortunately, the presence of people like fugitive tycoon Chen Yu-hao (陳由豪) in the Million Voices Against Corruption campaign -- as well as pro-unification politicians, entertainers who rely on the big China market and China-backed gangsters -- has changed Shih's position in the political spectrum. I worry that Shih's campaign will bring the Cultural Revolution back from the dead. The question is, is he in control?
The Cultural Revolution brought disaster to China and Beijing knows that if political intimidation and military coercion do not change Taiwan, it can use the campaign to depose Chen to create a cultural revolution to divide Taiwan.
But will deposing Chen satisfy China's ultimate goal of controlling Taiwan?
The government and opposition must gain a clear understanding of the issue.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taipei. Translated by Lin Ya-ti
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS