Chinese officials are far too sophisticated to follow the Soviet example and say "we will bury you" to US visitors. But they exude robust self-confidence.
Along with rapid economic growth has come increased diplomatic penetration around the world, as well as a growing military. The People's Republic of China is on the move.
As a result, more than a few Americans, along with some of their Asian allies, are worrying that "they will bury us." Or go to war trying to do so.
Hopefully not. But pitfalls in the US-China relationship abound.
A good place to start in trying to understand China is China: The Balance Sheet, a joint project by the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Institute for International Economics.
The authors observe: "The direction that China and US-China relations take will define the strategic future of the world for years to come. No relationship matters more -- for better or worse -- in resolving the enduring challenges of our time."
Despite China's economic progress, rural Chinese, who make up two-thirds of the population, remain desperately poor. Although China is likely to continue growing, it faces enormous challenges. Thus, suggest the writers, while we should expect more growth, temporary stagnation or even collapse is possible.
The volume maintains a similar measured tone throughout. On the critical issue of US-China relations, there is good news, at least in the short term.
The researchers write: "Beijing seems to understand its limitations at present. Chinese leaders have no illusions that the PLA [People's Liberation Army] is a match for the US military, will catch up in the foreseeable future, or will measurably narrow the gap in comprehensive national power for decades, at least."
Despite inevitable disagreements, there is no intrinsic reason for conflict between China and the US. Ensuring that they don't is the task for thoughtful diplomacy.
Jed Babbin and Edward Timberlake, long-time hawks, take a very different view in Showdown: Why China Wants War With the United States. They see China as a looming threat, dedicated to the destruction of the US.
Indeed, in their view, China "is now engaged in a second cold war, the Pacific Cold War, with the United States." The next step is armed conflict, and: "This war will begin when China decides the time for it has come."
Their main argument is that Beijing is building up its military. But from China's perspective, such a build-up, which starts from a very low, antiquated base, could be seen as defensive, designed to deter the US from attacking China.
After all, Washington's increases in military outlays dwarf those of China. Moreover, the US freely attacks countries even when its vital interests are not at stake -- Iraq and Serbia being the most recent examples.
Babbin and Timberlake offer several war scenarios (one of the weirder ones involves Cuba, Columbia and China). But there is nothing in China's history or recent behavior to suggest an intention to challenge the US globally.
Thus, the real issue in US-China relations is continuing US hegemony in East Asia. It is unnatural to expect that Washington can forever dominate every continent. Washington must decide what issues warrant risking a massive regional war and nuclear exchange.
The worst flashpoint is Taiwan. Indeed, Ted Galen Carpenter of the Cato Institute devotes an entire book to the latter scenario.
There obviously are hawks in China, and they certainly are eyeing the US.
Yet, notes Carpenter: "It is often difficult for Americans and other Westerners to comprehend the depth of Chinese determination to get Taiwan to `return to the motherland.'"
In America's Coming War With China: A Collision Course Over Taiwan, Carpenter offers a scathing critique of Washington's current Taiwan policy: "Instead of achieving balance, the administration has increasingly sowed confusion, inviting miscalculation by Taipei or Beijing -- or even worse, by both capitals."
A friend of Taipei, Carpenter acknowledges the appeal of protecting what has become a prosperous democracy. Sell Taiwan weapons, he advocates. But don't provide a security guarantee, he warns.
The future of US-China relations will almost certainly be complicated, though obviously it is in the interests of everyone throughout East Asia that relations remain peaceful.
Let us hope that US policymakers do a better job of handling China than they have done of "managing" Middle Eastern affairs.
Doug Bandow was a special assistant to the late US president Ronald Reagan.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS