IF I were Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), I would know that the biggest obstacles on my way to the top spot are President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), not Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his party. I would make an in-depth review of the ultimate meaning of the public's support for the DPP regime, and I would seriously consider what exactly the DPP's name represents for the people of Taiwan.
If I were Su, I would position myself as a "counterbalance" to Chen, rather than his subordinate. With the Presidential Office severely battered by corruption scandals, I would demonstrate my daring and resolution by turning the Cabinet into the cleanest government agency and placing it beyond manipulation by anyone. I would appoint a fearless minister without portfolio to take responsibility for anti-corruption reforms. I would build a report and disciplinary system to counteract corruption among government officials, demanding that every Cabinet agency root out the practice of red envelopes and behavior such as bribery and exchanges of interests. Were such behavior to be encountered, it would be thoroughly investigated.
If I were Su, I would know that the bureaucratic system as a whole has lost its central ideal, and that the gigantic government machine has become a mechanism for personal gain rather than for serving the public. Rebuilding the integrity and core values of the system does not require Chen's approval or negotiations with the opposition, it only takes determination, resolution and solutions.
If I were Su, I would pay attention to the class problem in political parties. Classes are a kind of social structure. Whether people talk about them or not does not change the fact that they exist. If I were Su, I would know that no party can represent both capitalism and the working classes at the same time.
I would redistribute social wealth through tax reform and concrete measures from the Council of Labor Affairs, vowing to the public that the DPP during my term would refuse to lean toward or pledge its loyalty to big business and that from now on, the DPP would be transformed into a party that represents workers, farmers and the general public. The era that emphasized ethnic origin must make way for class politics. If political development must be decided by categorization of people into different groups, then the DPP must replace the concept of "origin" with the concept of "distribution."
If I were Su, I would get rid of the Taishan (泰山) and Gangshan (岡山) toll collection stations first to give residents in Taipei and Kaohsiung a good reason to vote for the DPP in the year-end mayoral and city councilor elections. In fact, all the toll stations on the Sun Yat-sen Freeway, which opened to traffic in 1978, should have already passed into history according to promises of the former KMT regime. However, during the six years of DPP rule, the entire system has remained in place, even becoming a channel for collusion between the government and business. If I were Su, I would know that such problems cannot be resolved by appointing a new minister of transportation and communications.
As people's incomes constantly shrink because of the economic downturn and with the Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) system having descended into farce, I would meet the promises that the former KMT regime failed to fulfill and turn the freeway into a real "free way" for the people, not a channel for government-business collusion.
If I were Su, I would continue to insist on revising Chen's policies and bravely face up to China's economic might. I would pay special attention to the human rights movement in China, and make every effort to provide timely and necessary assistance to assist China's democratization. If I were Su, I would know that there can never be hope for peaceful resolution of the conflict between a democratic Taiwan and a despotic China. In other words, I would make Taiwan a strong supporter of the Chinese democracy and human rights movement.
More importantly, if I were Su, I would come up with a new pro-localization discourse. This discourse would be different from Chen's "love Taiwan" slogan which he brings out as a shield whenever he faces a crisis. It would be a discourse on the methods and values the Taiwanese people need to take care of themselves. It would be a discourse integrating what Taiwan was in the past, what it has presently and what we want the Taiwanese people to be like in the future. If I were Su, I would know that opening the economy and national borders is fine, but that the issue of what it means to be Taiwanese cannot be opened up for discussion with the Chinese regime.
In a word, if I were Su, I would define myself as a political leader who could change Taiwan, instead of being a premier who only tries to avoid making any mistakes so that he can finish his term safely. I would know that Chen's failure is my opportunity. Government reform, returning wealth to the public, dealing with China and wealth redistribution according to the redefinition of localization -- if Su can accomplish all these tasks, which Chen has failed to accomplish during his term, I believe that historians in the future would give him a fair evaluation.
Yao Jen-to is an assistant professor in the Graduate Institute of Sociology at National Tsing Hua University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past