The ongoing political strife may have caused many people to overlook other important issues concerning Taiwan's future. One of the most urgent and important things going on currently is a major market realignment of the local cable TV industry. The process has been fraught with open conflict, veiled attacks and complexity. It has also exposed a host of serious problems.
Eastern Multimedia Co (EMC,
According to in-depth studies carried out by our party over the last two years, a reasonable cable TV subscription fee should not exceed NT$250 per month per household, since that would give operators a reasonable profit, rather than the current NT$600 prescribed by the Government Information Office (GIO). Excessive subscription fees are the root cause of the problem, and when local governments were deliberating on cable TV subscription fees earlier this year, the result was that the GIO and local governments agreed to a monthly subscription fee of around NT$250.
We don't have to rely on clever accountants to understand that foreign investors have paid sky-high prices for controlling stakes in EMC and China Network Systems Co (CNS, 中嘉網路). In recent years, customers have had to fork out between NT$500 and NT$600 per month for local cable TV services. Leaving aside the issues of service, quality and content, the NT$42,000 per subscriber these foreign companies paid amounts to seven years of subscription fees per household. That is, even if these foreign investors do not spend a dollar, it will still take them seven years to get their initial investment back.
Foreign investors of course have made detailed calculations. They are not willing to sustain long term losses to "aid" Taiwan's consumers. Most importantly, there are many hidden benefits and even chances to earn exorbitant profits that outsiders are unaware of, and this is the reason for this outcome.
Cable TV operators claim that current subscription fees are too low, when the fact is that they have earned back their initial investment and continued to run these firms without investing in technology or hardware. After having earned their fill, they treat their customers like pigs at an auction and sell them off to the highest foreign bidder and allow them to exploit Taiwan's consumers further.
Having seen deal after deal involving staggering amounts of money, I have come to realize how clever these businesspeople are. Many people believe that times are hard, it never occurred to them that their cable TV operators could rake in between NT$40,000 and NT$50,000 per subscriber.
In fact, the problem relating to the cable TV industry results from the erroneous policies of the former KMT government. By letting local big business monopolize the industry, a public utility, at least the money stayed in Taiwan. But now, foreign investors have taken over, gaining a monopoly over Taiwan's cultural independence and choice and the opportunity to practice cultural imperialism. The time is now ripe for the DPP government to give full play to transitional justice and turn the tables on the unjust operations of cable TV firms.
Tien Chiu-chin is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US