I read with interest the recent article ("Blowing in the wind," Aug. 20, page 17) setting out the future development of wind power in Taiwan. Many of the issues raised were similar to those we have faced in the UK, where we recently published an Energy Review with the aim of tackling both climate change and energy security.
These are equally, if not more important for Taiwan, given its lack of local energy resources and the indiscriminate nature of the impact of climate change. The review set out a number of conclusions and the need for a number of parallel approaches, tackling both electricity generation and energy efficiency.
The UK government has set a target of 10 percent of electricity being generated from renewable sources by 2010, up from the 4 percent at present. This would make the UK one of Europe's leading generators of renewable energy. This target is an integral part of the UK government's aim of reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 60 percent by 2050.
As noted in your article, administrative uncertainty is a significant barrier to further progress. In the UK, planning regulations are being reviewed to reduce the delays and uncertainties that energy projects face. Cost issues also exist but carbon-pricing mechanisms have helped to make renewable energy sources more economically attractive. Such mechanisms help to ensure that targets on greenhouse gas emissions are met in the most efficient, lowest-cost manner.
Along with Taiwan's Bureau of Energy, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Industrial Technology Research Institute, we are holding a Renewable Energy Seminar on Nov. 30. This is a good opportunity for both Taiwan and the UK to exchange views and discuss how we can co-operate on the forthcoming projects in Taiwan.
I encourage Taiwan to continue to pursue its goals on renewable energy sources. This will require commitment and innovation from both central and local governments. It will also require the support of legislators and the general public. Awareness of the need to tackle climate change grows everyday; governments need to work together with industry and the public to identify win-win ways of tackling these important issues.
Michael Reilly,
Director-General, British Trade and Culture Office
Taipei
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS