I read with interest the recent article ("Blowing in the wind," Aug. 20, page 17) setting out the future development of wind power in Taiwan. Many of the issues raised were similar to those we have faced in the UK, where we recently published an Energy Review with the aim of tackling both climate change and energy security.
These are equally, if not more important for Taiwan, given its lack of local energy resources and the indiscriminate nature of the impact of climate change. The review set out a number of conclusions and the need for a number of parallel approaches, tackling both electricity generation and energy efficiency.
The UK government has set a target of 10 percent of electricity being generated from renewable sources by 2010, up from the 4 percent at present. This would make the UK one of Europe's leading generators of renewable energy. This target is an integral part of the UK government's aim of reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 60 percent by 2050.
As noted in your article, administrative uncertainty is a significant barrier to further progress. In the UK, planning regulations are being reviewed to reduce the delays and uncertainties that energy projects face. Cost issues also exist but carbon-pricing mechanisms have helped to make renewable energy sources more economically attractive. Such mechanisms help to ensure that targets on greenhouse gas emissions are met in the most efficient, lowest-cost manner.
Along with Taiwan's Bureau of Energy, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Industrial Technology Research Institute, we are holding a Renewable Energy Seminar on Nov. 30. This is a good opportunity for both Taiwan and the UK to exchange views and discuss how we can co-operate on the forthcoming projects in Taiwan.
I encourage Taiwan to continue to pursue its goals on renewable energy sources. This will require commitment and innovation from both central and local governments. It will also require the support of legislators and the general public. Awareness of the need to tackle climate change grows everyday; governments need to work together with industry and the public to identify win-win ways of tackling these important issues.
Michael Reilly,
Director-General, British Trade and Culture Office
Taipei
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS