Every day without fail, Cao Xiaoxian goes to a local government office, as he has for a year, to beg for help for his family.
His face drawn and tired, the 34-year-old has no choice -- he has AIDS, and so has his wife and his 11-year-old son.
The only one who may not infected with HIV, the virus that causes the disease, is his nine-month-old baby daughter, but she is too young for a definitive test.
"This morning I went [to the government office] again. They told me the central government didn't give any instructions about which family should get help and which would not," Cao says.
He was infected when he sold his blood to government blood stations collecting plasma to make blood products, as many farmers in central China do to help eke out a living.
Cao had to give up his part-time job as a delivery truck driver because the disease and the antiretroviral drugs he is taking leave him too weak to work.
"If he does any hard labor, he gets a fever," says his wife Zhou Xiaoneng, also 34.
Without any means of income, the couple live off their land and sometimes the generosity of donors.
To save money, they rarely eat meat, do not have a telephone and do not use the fan even in the hot summer, turning it on only briefly when guests visit.
"We have no money to even buy candy for our kids," Zhou says.
Barely surviving
The family is no exception. Many other families with several members suffering from the deadly disease barely manage to survive.
Although billions of dollars is being spent on life-saving AIDS drugs across the world, donor governments are failing to ensure developing world patients have adequate diets, the UN World Food Program (WFP) warned last week at the 16th International AIDS Conference in Toronto.
The WFP joined the non-governmental organization Partners in Health here to say that people getting antiretroviral therapies were much more likely to die if they were undernourished.
They nutrition programs for HIV patients were critically underfunded, even though a lack of food was often cited by people living with the disease, most of them in developing nations, as the most urgent need.
Although China has been praised for launching a program to provide HIV-positive citizens with free drugs in 2003, it provides very little else, even for people like Cao who were victims of an unsanitary government-approved scheme to encourage poor farmers to sell blood beginning in the 1980s.
Families with AIDS receive a stipend of just 12 yuan (US$1.50) per person for month, but not everyone gets the money as some corrupt local officials have been known to siphon off funds, volunteers in villages with a high number of AIDS sufferers say.
Babies receive milk powder and children who have AIDS or whose parents have AIDS are supposed to get free tuition, but some people receive only a waiver for a part of their tuition.
No backup
An AIDS patient in another village, Qiudian, says she does not know how she and her husband will be able to put their teenage daughter through high school.
"If she doesn't get a scholarship, she will have to drop out of school," says Cheng Xiaolan, 38.
In Cheng's home, a brand-new washing machine which was part of her wedding dowry years ago, sits covered in the cardboard box it came in. The family no longer uses it because they need to save on the electricity bill.
"I hope the government will give us some economic assistance," Cheng says.
Patients like her also have to scrape together money to pay for medical expenses that the government does not pay.
"It's still not adequate," says Wiwat Rojanapithayakorn, the World Health Organization's HIV/AIDS team leader in China, regarding the amount of support China provides to patients.
"They still don't pay for diseases associated with AIDS -- opportunistic diseases such as tuberculosis, liver problems, pneumonia and fungal infections," he says.
Around 650,000 people in China have the HIV virus, translating into a rate of 0.05 percent in a population of 1.3 billion, but the rate of infections is rapidly rising.
Last year, 70,000 more Chinese contracted the virus, equivalent to 192 per day, according to official estimates, leading the government and outside experts to predict there could be 1.5 million cases by 2010.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers