During his election campaign in 2000, President Chen Shui-bian (
I then wrote a note that I asked Lee to give to Chen, saying: "Building a new country is more important than winning the presidency."
It really isn't very important to be president, especially not in the kind of extended settler state known as "the Republic of China."
I really do not care very much about whether the president steps down or not, but the fact that I am not participating in the ongoing efforts to force him out of office does not mean that I support him.
To be blunt, during his six years in office, Chen has not put all his efforts into building a new country. Instead, his "Four Noes" policy and his statement that those participating in the campaign to create a new constitution and change the nation's title were deceiving themselves have made me very resentful, and I have criticized him for it.
I have been particularly angered by the increasingly Chinese Nationalist Party-like (KMT) demeanor of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Good examples of this behavior can be seen in the alleged corruption of presidential aide Chen Che-nan (
The attempts by the pan-blue camp to recall Chen are not a new phenomenon. The only difference is that this time, they have found a righteous slogan: "anti-corruption."
I will never be able to believe that the KMT is working against corruption, because their own ranks are full of it. If we counted the number of corruption cases or the amounts involved, the cases the KMT has been involved in would always outnumber those of the DPP.
In the end, the KMT is engaging in political warfare -- in cooperation with their fellow travelers in the media -- trying to destroy the image of the localized government in order to restore their old regime.
With this basic understanding, it is of course impossible for me to follow up on the failed recall motion by joining hands with the pan-green academics in a continued attempt to accomplish the pan-blue camp's unfinished undertaking. It would be even more impossible for me to get up on stage with former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) and let him use me as his tool, especially after having found that this group of people is filled with those looking for publicity, a platform or benefits. My craving for clean government demands that I not condescend to mixing with these people.
This group of people who want the president to step down of course also includes some of my friends, and I don't doubt their idealism. Their focus on one issue, however, differs from my habit of looking at overall strategy. The nation has many unsettled accounts from the last 50-odd years, but the group only focuses on the "greed" that surrounds the president. This seems to be quite disproportionate.
I also want these idealistic friends of mine to ask Shih why he didn't support our side during the past few years when we have been under vicious attack by the pan-blue camp, in which they and their communist backers have worked to destroy the cause of Taiwanese independence. Why is Shih now instead standing on the side of the pan-blue camp and calling on the president to step down?
In a letter to President Chen, Shih said that he had once asked the president to guarantee that he would insist that "Taiwan is a sovereign and independent state, and never retreat from that point of view." Shih also asked the president to insist that "the people of Taiwan have the right to decide their own future, and will never give up that right."
Will Shih be able to ask the people making donations to his anti-Chen campaign -- and the media that support him -- to insist on these same principles?
Finally, I would like to ask if the president's resignation would mean that the pan-blue camp will let the Legislative Yuan discuss the arms procurement bill. Will they be able to stop opposing and blocking the government's every move? Will the KMT return the national assets it has stolen? Will it stop colluding with the Chinese Communists? These are issues that should also be considered when we talk about whether President Chen should step down.
If he really does step down, I want him to pass my note on to Vice President Annette Lu (
Lee Hsiao-feng is a professor of history at Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US