Some people believe that being separated by an ocean leaves peoples far apart. For Canada and Taiwan, the ocean happens to bring us closer together.
The world's oceans, and the fish that live within them, are matters of key concern for both Canada and Taiwan. Taiwan has one of the world's largest tuna fishing fleets, and Canada's fishing industry has long been a staple for the economies of our coastal communities.
Unfortunately, the oceans and high seas fisheries that have provided us with so much have not always been cared for properly in return. Today, many fish stocks around the world are either fully exploited or overexploited. If we want future generations to benefit from this resource, we have a duty to stop overfishing and care for the ecosystems that sustain these fish.
Most countries face similar problems in trying to end over-fishing. These include addressing overcapacity in fishing fleets, and preventing illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. It is only natural for us to learn from one another and find ways to work in unison to meet common goals. To achieve our goals, we need to work together and deliver concrete results.
Last month, Canada was pleased to take part in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Fisheries Working Group and an associated workshop held in Kaohsiung. The title of this workshop was, appropriately enough, "Sharing Experience in Managing Fishing Capacity."
The subsequent working group meeting in Kaohsiung provided an opportunity for participants to move further toward the goal of ending overfishing. It also allowed us to build on the Bali Plan of Action developed during the 2nd APEC ocean-related ministerial meeting held in Bali, Indonesia, last September.
The Bali plan outlines priorities for action in three key areas: balancing conservation and sustainable use; providing for sustainable economic benefits from the oceans; and enabling sustainable development of coastal communities.
This action plan is international in scope and requires a combination of local, regional and global efforts to see it succeed. The role of regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) is key.
The international community is increasingly frustrated by continued overfishing and the resulting depletion of fish stocks, which is occurring, in part, under the watch of RFMOs. Fishing entities around the world must work more effectively through RFMOs to sustainably manage fisheries on the high seas. Canada and Taiwan, for instance, share a responsibility for strengthening and following the fisheries management rules established by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) and the Western and Central Pacific Tuna Commission when fishing our tuna quotas.
As a result of decisions taken by ICCAT at last year's annual meeting, the Taiwanese fishing fleet has had to make some significant adjustments. Canada, which has had to undertake its own painful adjustments, and other countries are fully aware of the efforts that the Taiwanese government and fishing industry are making to reduce its fleet size and fishing effort, and to ensure that Taiwanese vessels do not engage in illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing activities. We are encouraged by these efforts and the growing awareness of fishing stakeholders around the world that the international rules for high seas fisheries must be respected.
The need for international co-operation in sustainably managing global fisheries and ensuring healthy oceans ecosystems is as pressing as ever. The ocean that lies between us is not a barrier for inaction; it is a source for collaboration and shared interests.
Gordon Houlden is the executive director of the Canadian Trade Office in Taipei.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers