Coca-Cola holds top position as the world's highest-ranked brand name, followed by Microsoft and IBM. Rounding out the top 10 are General Electric, Intel, Nokia, Disney, McDonald's, Marlboro and Mercedes.
We all know these brand names and they have tremendous value, the name itself contributing a large proportion of the company's value as reflected in the share price.
But branding isn't just about products. It's about image and countries also have their own brand attributes. We all associate quality with countries like Japan and Germany. We watch countries like South Korea move from the bottom of the quality scale to a point where some of their products are now widely accepted as high quality. The rapid rise of Samsung cameras and phones is a case that immediately springs to mind.
When we look at Taiwan, we can see a similar movement, from 25 years ago when the country was associated with shoddy products like cheap umbrellas and dangerous toys to where it is today, universally recognized as a manufacturer of quality goods, from cellphones to computers.
But this position needs to be continually reinforced and protected. There are many instances where companies have come close to losing their brand value for many reasons, a classic example being that of Nike, which was exposed in 2001 for abuse of child labor in Pakistan and Cambodia. The furor in the press and on the Internet resulted in the closure of the factories and scarred Nike's brand name worldwide.
In a similar fashion, countries need to continually reinforce and protect their brand name.
In an isolated country like Taiwan, the brand name is even more important than elsewhere. With little international support in it's stance against China, Taiwan needs all the help it can get and the main hope to obtain that help in the future is to advance the fledgling democracy to a point where it is recognized as a beacon for others to follow, a shining light that can be held up as an example well worth protecting against any threat from other less enlightened regimes. It has to be a priority for any president and any political party whose main duty surely is to protect the country's people from harm.
A large factor in the process of being accepted as a truly democratic country is represented by one sentence in the US Constitution: "No state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Until such time as the Taiwanese government can embrace this simple but vital philosophy we should fear for the future of this nation.
But if the nation's future is not that important, then by all means carry forward plans to exclude guest workers from the protection of the minimum wage, continue to allow instant deportations without redress to the law, and permit the use of an labor agent system that only has one thought in mind -- exploitation.
Tony Goodwin
Banciao
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers