The indefinite suspension of WTO talks announced on Monday is a major setback for international efforts to break down protectionist trade barriers and boost world economic growth, especially in poorer nations.
But more is at stake. The unexpected collapse of the WTO's Doha trade round, following disagreements on farm trade among the world's top six trading powers -- the US, the EU, Japan, Australia, India and Brazil -- looks set to worsen current global woes, marked by escalating Middle East violence and increasingly strained relations between Iran and Western nations.
WTO director general Pascal Lamy did not mince his words as he declared failure on Monday.
"We are in dire straits," he said, adding that with key WTO members still unable to bridge their differences over agriculture, he did not see how a deal could be reached by the end of the year.
The WTO chief did not set a new timetable for completing the talks.
Lamy's announcement trig-gered another round of an acrimonious blame game that the WTO's top trading powers have been playing since the Doha round was launched in the capital of Qatar five years ago.
EU negotiators immediately pointed an accusing finger at the US, saying the talks had come to a halt after Washington refused to slash billions of dollars of trade-distorting subsidies paid out to farmers.
"Surely the richest and strongest nation in the world, with the highest standard of living in the world, can afford to give as well as take," said EU trade chief Peter Mandelson.
The US in turn blamed Brazil and India for being inflexible on cutting barriers to industrial imports and the EU for refusing to make deeper cuts in its farm import tariffs.
US Trade Representative Susan Schwab said Washington did not want a "Doha lite" and accused the EU of trying to protect itself by blaming the US.
Developing nations were pessimistic about chances of putting the talks back on track.
"This is a serious setback, a major setback," said Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim.
The talks were "somewhere between intensive care and the crematorium," added India's Trade and Industry Minister Kamal Nath.
The WTO breakdown could not have come at a worse time, warned Jean-Pierre Lehmann, director of the influential Evian group trade think-tank based in Lausanne, Switzerland.
Given current "global turbulence and uncertainty" -- including the Israel-Lebanon conflict, bloodshed in Iraq, the risks of further conflagrations in the Middle East and the rising price of oil -- Lehmann said the US, the EU and Japan should have taken the lead in easing international trade tensions.
Instead, they decided to put their vested interests -- especially in the narrow farm sector -- ahead of global concerns.
"This is a tragic outcome. It points to a dramatic failure of leadership among the leading trading powers," said Lehmann.
There is special concern that the outburst of transatlantic acrimony following the collapse of the talks could impact on US-EU efforts to ease current tensions in the Middle East.
The US and the EU have shown in the past that they can work together on the global political stage while engaging in barbed exchanges on trade issues.
But their current rift in the WTO comes on top of divergent transatlantic views on the Middle East conflict, with EU nations backing Lebanese calls for an immediate ceasefire and the US saying it wants to focus on eliminating the root causes of the conflict before there is a cessation of hostilities.
The dramatic collapse of the discussions which have long been seen as a test of the credibility of the WTO and especially for its dispute settlement system, is a blow to the reputation of the WTO.
Analysts predict that with the Doha round in deep freeze, there will be a proliferation of bilateral and regional free trade deals. These, they fear, could damage the WTO multilateral trading system, based on the principle of non-discrimination among nations.
With the WTO's reputation in tatters, "discrimination will come back with a vengeance," warns Lehmann, adding that while richer developing countries will be actively courted by the EU and the US for bilateral deals, poorer nations will be left out.
The US has cautioned that unless a WTO deal can be secured by the end of the year, the negotiating process may have to be put on ice until after US presidential elections in 2008.
This is essentially because President Bush's "fast-track" authority to strike trade deals expires next year. Without such backing, any trade agreement struck by Washington could be amended endlessly by an ever-critical US Congress.
Historical experience provides some hope that the current crisis could mean future opportunity. Previous global trade talks were also effectively suspended in 1990 but were then revived, allowing for a final "Uruguay Round" agreement to be clinched in 1994.
But for that to be repeated, WTO negotiators will have to stop being "myopic and mediocre" in their outlook, said Lehmann. So far, the prospects for such a change in approach look grim.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US