For weeks, the media spotlight has fixed on the high-profile comebacks of two former female officials in Hong Kong: former No. 2 leader Anson Chan (
The two women have surprised the territory by unexpectedly lending vocal support to the implementation of full democracy -- an unthinkable stance for either to have taken when in office. Communist leaders in Beijing are wary of drastic political changes, and civil servants rarely speak out against those policies.
But there's little doubt that Ip and Chan -- dubbed the "new democracy dames" -- are determined to take up the sensitive topic, and the duo have quickly emerged as leaders in the push for full democracy.
Their involvement in Hong Kong's flagging debate about when voters should be able to directly elect their leader and entire legislature has rekindled interest in a timetable for political reform, a topic that has taken a back seat amid strong economic growth.
"Ip or Chan's appearance shouldn't just be seen as a power struggle. They may create an interactive effect that will bring long-term influences for Hong Kong's democratic development," said Timothy Wong (
"Both, especially Anson, are focusing on democratic demands. The democracy debate will surely stand out among other issues in the next few years, and this incessant discussion will mean the government can't avoid the topic any longer," Wong said.
Promises
Hong Kong was promised a wide degree of autonomy when it was returned to China in 1997, but Beijing has ruled out full democracy in the near future. Only half of the city's 60 legislators are elected. An 800-member panel loyal to Beijing chooses the territory's leader.
In less than a month, the city has seen Ip launching a think tank, hosting a television talk show, and challenging Chan, among others, to discuss the issue with her.
Meanwhile, Chan has urged Hong Kongers to take to the streets to demand full democracy, and she is also countering the government's studies on democratic reform by setting up her own "core group."
Both women were formidable, tough civil servants when they were in office, and analysts say both probably intend to pave their way for a future leadership run. Ip has declined to talk about her political ambitions, while Chan has not ruled out the possibility.
"I intend to play an active role, and you can expect to hear more from me on this issue," Chan -- who remains highly popular since retiring in 2001 -- said recently.
Chan, 66, was known as a champion of so-called "Western values" such as civil freedoms and human rights when in office. But critics say her passionate calls for a speedy change to full democracy are uncharacteristic of her, and the pro-Beijing camp has accused her of being an opportunist.
Ip's stance, meanwhile, is more intriguing. She was a respected ally of the pro-Beijing camp and widely regarded as a defender of the status quo. She was forced to step down in 2003 after sparking public outrage by standing firmly by a deeply unpopular anti-subversion bill, which many thought would curtail civil liberties. Her handling of the issue was attacked as authoritarian.
But recently, Ip said she was "cautiously optimistic" that Hong Kong could achieve full democracy by 2012 -- although she also stressed that direct elections are not a magic elixir to solve all problems.
Her political views appeared to be more in line with those of the administration. Like Ip, leader Donald Tsang (
"When someone perceived to be a conservative comes out and talks about direct elections by a date as soon as 2012, it shows that the possibility of it happening is growing," Wong said.
But others are less optimistic that either Ip's group or Chan's could make a real difference.
"Their abilities are limited. Do you believe China will accept full democracy in 2012? Realistically, everyone knows that Tsang will surely win in the 2007 elections," said political professor Joseph Cheng (
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US