"Time" magazine published a long feature in its June 19 edition about the benefits of studying Mandarin -- in China. Not once did the magazine's 10-page report mention that Taiwan is also a good place to study, learn and live the Chinese language. How could such a reputable, international magazine, with many readers in Taiwan miss the boat on this?
When a reporter in Taiwan queried a Time editor in Hong Kong about the cover story, which was titled "Get Ahead, Learn Mandarin," he received the following note: "The story did not discuss Taiwan because the subject of our cover story that issue was the rising interest in studying Chinese. That phenomenon is directly related to the growth of the Chinese economy, hence the focus on China. People study Mandarin in Taiwan, of course, but that has long been the case and isn't really news."
Good answer, but it didn't really answer my question. When an international news magazine devotes its cover story to "learning Mandarin" in Asian nations such as Japan and South Korea and does not once mention the country of Taiwan as a place to learn Chinese, something is very wrong in the biased way the editors perceive things. Perhaps Time's editors in Hong Kong believe that Taiwan is a mere province of China and therefore not worth a mention in the article in question?
Mark Caltonhill, a longtime resident of Taiwan, recently wrote an online commentary in the Taiwan Journal about his own learning curve in acquiring Mandarin. He noted that Taiwan was a very good place to learn and live the Chinese language, and is not in any way inferior to China.
Caltonhill wrote: "Whatever [a] student's interests and specialties -- art or history, religion or philosophy, literature, martial arts or Chinese cuisine -- Taiwan has as much or more to offer [than China]."
Taipei, of course, is a very good place to study Chinese. Time's editors know that. Time even has reporters who work for the magazine here. And there are many schools here that offer Mandarin classes, such as National Taiwan Normal University's Center for Chinese Language and Culture, the National Taiwan University Language Center and the Tamkang University Language Center.
The Time article stressed that "while English may be the only truly international language, millions of tongues are wagging over what is rapidly becoming the world's other lingua franca: Mandarin."
Quoting a statement by British linguist David Gaddol, the magazine added: "In many Asian countries, in Europe and the US, Mandarin has emerged as the new must-have language."
Time even quoted a professor in China, who said: "Promoting the use of Chinese among overseas people has gone beyond purely cultural issues. It can help build up our national strength and should be taken as a way to develop our country's `soft power.'" That was Hu Youqing, a Chinese-language professor at Nanjing University talking.
Time mentioned that China has sent more than 2,000 volunteers to teach Mandarin overseas, mostly in Asian nations such as Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia and South Korea. Why didn't it also mention that Taiwan also has sent volunteer teachers to several Asian countries? China's goal is to have 100 million foreigners studying Mandarin by the end of the decade. Well, won't some of them be studying Mandarin in Taipei or Kaohsiung? Time missed the boat again.
Will Mandarin ever overtake English as the world's common language? Probably not, but as Time notes, "just as knowing English proved a key to getting ahead in the 20th century, learning Chinese will provide an edge in the 21st." This was a good point and was an important theme of the entire cover story. But by ignoring Taiwan -- not mentioning Taiwan even once in the entire feature -- the magazine's editors showed their ignorance and bias against Taiwan, even though they work and live in Asia.
Taipei is a very good place to learn and live the Chinese language, and Time magazine did a huge disservice to its readers around the world by ignoring Taiwan completely in its June 19 cover story.
Wake up, Time magazine, China does not have a monopoly on Chinese-language centers and Mandarin schools. Wake up and smell the coffee -- in Taiwan, too.
Dan Bloom is a freelance writer based in Chiayi.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS