Last Saturday, a group of pan-green academics released a statement entitled "Democracy and the Moral Crisis of Taiwanese Identity -- Our Appeal to the President, the Ruling Party and Taiwanese Citizens."
The statement, drafted by Academia Sinica researcher Wu Nai-teh (吳乃德) and supported by other academics associated with the 1990 student movement, urged President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to "set a good example for Taiwan's democratic politics by seriously considering stepping down" to take full responsibility for the scandals related to his close aides and family members.
The statement, launched by former staunch supporters of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), cast another shadow over Chen's already fragile leadership, especially in the wake of the pan-blue camp's attempt to recall him late last month.
The disappointment and frustration of these old friends of the DPP with regard to Chen's failure to maintain a higher level of morality and discipline in his family and staff is understand-able. However, the solution they suggest would not necessarily translate into the long-term institutional reform needed to untie the current political knot.
What really matters is the extent to which Taiwan's imperfect institutions can provide a safety net to maintain political stability when a national leader suffers a loss of public trust.
While the academics urged Chen to take "moral responsibility" by stepping down, it is "political responsibility" that is more important for Chen. If evidence shows that Chen is involved in anything illegal, he should bear both "political and moral responsibility" and relinquish power.
Theoretically, if Chen were to step down, there would be no constitutional crisis, because Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) would step into the presidency. Nevertheless, the political crisis that would be accompanied by Chen's resignation constitutes a greater concern.
The fact is, Chen's immediate resignation would not solve anything. Instead, it would trigger an even more severe political crisis. The pan-blue alliance would continue to sabotage Lu and the DPP government, and utilize the power shift for its own benefit. Can society really afford non-stop political chaos until 2008?
Moreover, the public has sent a clear message to all political leaders that political and economic stability are their highest concerns. Conflicts and hostility between the governing and opposition parties should be halted and no politician should attempt to take advantage of the judicial process to serve their own ends.
For Chen and the DPP, they should buck up, suck it in and come fighting. They must seize the opportunity to reinforce both structural and political reforms. And the public must see the indictment of former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan (陳哲男), and Chen's son-in-law Chao Chien-ming (趙建銘) as a turning point for cleaning up the nation's political system.
The academic community should now propose a "contract for clean politics" to Chen and the government, as well as to the opposition parties. The "contract" should entail a joint effort to pass so-called sunshine bills and the political contribution law, as well as establish an independent commission against corruption.
What the nation's democracy needs now encompasses three important qualities -- perseverance, robustness and tenacity. As a country struggling to deepen democracy, Taiwan yearns for more discipline, institutionalization and order.
The government should engage in close consultations with opinion leaders and academics to jointly outline a viable blueprint to revitalize the nation's democracy.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US