Two contrasting news items were reported on Monday last week. First, the government vowed to double Taiwan's per capita GDP to US$32,000 by 2015. The second news story said that the average salary in Taiwan has dropped over the past five years, regardless of employee educational levels. The latter serves as a negative footnote to the former.
Taiwan's economy has grown over the past five years, so why have average employee salaries dropped rather than increased? Obviously, all the benefits of Taiwan's economic development over the past five years have gone to business.
The reason for this is either a decrease in the demand for labor or an increase in the labor supply. Judging from the salary cutbacks, I am sure that it is the result of a falling demand for labor, caused by insufficient domestic investment. According to investment statistics, the lack of domestic investment is mainly caused by Taiwan's excessive investment in China.
If Chinese investment really is as complementary and beneficial to Taiwan's economic growth as those who advocate "actively going west" claim, then such investment should improve and upgrade Taiwan, and not result in the country's economy being undermined; nor should it replace Taiwan's salaried classes, but rather boost the demand for labor and bring about salary increases. Indeed, falling salaries in the face of economic growth is indirect evidence that excessive investment in China is bad for the nation's economy.
Several issues regarding the government's pledge to double Taiwan's GDP in 10 years also require clarification.
To begin with, doubling GDP does not automatically translate into doubling employee salaries. Whether salaries increase will depend on the policies used to advance the government's pledge. If the nation's economic policies from the past few years remain unchanged, with merely formal restrictions on China-bound investment and a tax system that encourages the outflow of capital, then the salaried classes might be further disadvantaged even if the goal of doubling Taiwan's GDP is achieved.
Further, the government's forecasts are calculated in US dollars. If the US maintains an annual inflation rate of 7 percent, then the US dollar will depreciate by the same amount, 7 percent, yearly.
In other words, even if Taiwan's real economic growth in dollar terms remains at zero over the next 10 years, the government can still reach its goal.
Finally, the government should amend its statistical methods and definitions in conjunction with its GDP goal.
The salaried classes, farmers and small vendors account for a major portion of Taiwan's total population. Since the incomes and expenses of salaried households are closely related to the incomes of farmers and vendors, one could say that the interests of the salaried households are also the interests of the people of Taiwan.
The goals of doubling GDP per capita and doubling salaries require very different economic policies. If a consensus on increasing the percentage of capital that a company is allowed to invest in China is reached at the Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development, then the future of the salaried class will look even bleaker.
In the interests of the majority of Taiwanese, even a pledge to increase salaries by half is much more meaningful than a pledge to double the nation's GDP.
Lin Chia is an independent economics commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US