More than 600 million of the world's poorest people live in Africa -- often in crowded cities, or in small villages lacking health clinics or schools. Unlike every other region in the world, the poverty here worsens each year.
So when some of the world's most powerful leaders stood before the television cameras and promised drastic change, including an annual aid increase of US$50 billion by 2010 with half going to Africa, many Africans cheered. But a year on, the huzzahs are fading.
"They earned great kudos, internationally and at home. It looked like they were really doing something," Oxfam Great Britain's Muthoni Muriu says of the pledges made at last year's G8 summit, which host British Prime Minister Tony Blair had seen as the culmination of a year focused on Africa.
"We really must celebrate what little steps have been made," says Muriu, the British charity's Kenyan-born West Africa program director. "But we must see the big picture, which isn't that good."
Disease, conflict, illiteracy: Africa's ills are well known.
But the solutions aren't. Africans face a web of interlocking woe: How can you train workers if pupils aren't fed well enough to concentrate in school? How can businesses succeed if skilled employees fall sick with malaria? How do you stop the spread of malaria if the mosquitos that carry it thrive in open sewers?
Implicit in the G8 promises were expectations African leaders would do more to embrace democracy and clean up corruption. There, again, progress has been fitful.
Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi had served on Blair's Commission on Africa, whose work underpinned much of what emerged from last year's G8 summit. Meles had been widely praised as a reformer, but violence unleashed against opposition members protesting his election victory last year sparked international concern about his commitment to human rights.
In January, Britain cut all of its aid to Ethiopia's government and redirected the ?50 million (US$87 million) to humanitarian agencies or local governments.
There are bright spots, however. Voters in Mauritania approved term limits meant to keep presidents from holding onto power for life, and legislators in Nigeria protected such limits. The G8 last month struck Nigeria, notorious for corruption, from a financial black list, citing its progress fighting money laundering.
On the West's side, leaders promised universal access to AIDS treatments by the end of the decade and even as firm figures are hard to come by, movement toward that goal has been made over the last 18 months, many agree.
While development experts say more should be done, the US is credited by many with focusing attention on AIDS in Africa.
Most concretely, the IMF has canceled the debt owed it by many African countries and further reductions by other international lenders are scheduled, for those countries and others. The G8 said US$55 billion in debts could eventually be forgiven.
That act alone freed up cash that would have been used to pay the debt's interest, if not even the principal. Now, Africans and their international partners are building roads, financing schools, stocking shelves in health clinics.
After Zambia's red ink was wiped away, that country began offering its people free access to basic health care.
But skeptics say Western agencies granted many of the loans during the Cold War as inducement to African leaders, including flagrantly corrupt dictators, to ally against the Soviets.
Plus, there was little chance that many of the African countries would ever pay off the loans. It's easy to write off a lost cause, the pessimists say.
What's hard, development experts say, is for Western political leaders to make decisions that hurt their own voters. Increasing direct foreign aid, as promised in Scotland, translates directly into diminished public coffers.
International groups are accusing some of the G8 countries of "double counting" -- or moving debt write-offs to the aid-granted column, showing an increase in giving on balance sheets even as the pot of actual currency for projects in Africa may shrink.
Oxfam says that when the debt write-offs are factored out of Britain's reported aid of US$10.6 billion last year, that country actually spent 2 percent less than in 2004. France and Germany also came out in the negative column, according to Oxfam.
Many of the Gleneagles promises aren't designed to be fulfilled for many years, so it's difficult to judge whether there has been firm movement over the past year, analysts say.
Some political leaders agree they need help sticking to their stated aims.
On June 26, Blair acknowledged that key G8 commitments to help Africa have not been met, and he appointed UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan to lead a panel monitoring progress toward the goals.
Blair said in a speech in London that the Africa Progress Panel will be funded by Microsoft Corp chairman Bill Gates. Members will include anti-poverty campaigner Bob Geldof and President Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation with 130 million people.
The G8 leaders meet again this month in Russia and Annan, himself an African from Ghana, said he wouldn't let the leaders' pledges slip from the agenda.
"When I attend this year's Group of Eight Summit in St Petersburg two weeks from now, I shall press the leaders, press them to follow through on their commitments to Africa," he told reporters at a recent African Union summit.
For Africa, where most are quick to voice their gratitude for the grants, debt write-offs and other help, a major hitch is far more banal: farm subsidies. Weekend trade negotiations among ministers of WTO members broke down over the issue.
Africans say the money granted to farmers in America, Europe and China undercut their goods in the open market, making it harder to compete and hobbling efforts to advance without the help of rich patrons.
Doling out aid and clearing debt is much easier for elected politicians in rich nations than cutting subsidies, which hurts their own farmers, who also happen to be voters. By some estimates, annual farm subsidies outstrip aid payments in many countries.
Cotton producers in the west African nation of Mali say they just want to compete in a truly free market.
"We're not asking for subsidies of our own, we just want a fair price for our cotton and the same rules for everyone," says Barry Aminata Tour, president of the Malian activist group, Coalition for Debt and Development Alternatives. "Our people simply can't survive anymore by the fruits of their own labor."
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US