Taipei's oldest food market at Jiancheng Circle was consigned to history on July 2. A massive reconstruction project to rebuild the market was undertaken after it was damaged by fire in February 1999, at a cost of as much as NT$200 million (US$6.18 million). The result was a cylindrical building of glass that had pretensions of becoming a local landmark -- but totally failed to meet practical needs.
If we examine the Taipei City Government's eight-year urban renewal plan -- from Lungshan Temple's withdrawal from an underground mall project to Shilin Night Market's poor performance since being relocated -- a great amount of government money has been spent without any result.
Taipei is inferior to major cities in neighboring countries in terms of traffic management, quality of goods, discounts for shopping and the degree of internationalization. The city government is obsessed with the number of visitors who arrive, and often ignores that a substantial improvement in tourism usually comes from an increase in the value offered to tourists. It has obliterated the humanity and history of the city, with officials only doing their development planning from inside their offices.
The hawker stalls that made up Jiancheng Circle are part of the city's history. Most of the vendors are still doing good business today in other locations nearby. Evidently, the market's poor performance was not caused by the vendors and consumers. Rather, it was the lack of parking, a poor design that had no clear lines of movement on the first two floors, as well as narrow seating areas and aisles.
Unfortunately, the city government has been unable to face the problems objectively, attempting to turn it into a promotion center for traditional food after all the food vendors left.
Food is a mixture of tradition, culture and even emotions. It cannot be replaced by festivals that look good in appearance only. Blaming the market's failure on the public is irresponsible and immoral. But worse is that the city councilors passed a huge budget and allowed the city government to ignore local residents' petition. They even claimed that the policy mistake was a result of people's outdated dining habits and different historical backgrounds. I strongly hope that the public can see through this political trickery and buck-passing.
We must demand that those councilors who claimed they were concerned about this issue take responsibility and review the failure of the market. They should not show concern only when elect-ions approach, or when vendors, housing prices and the public are already hurt. Such concern is as meaningless as the money wasted on rebuilding the market.
Lo Ying-wei is a project manager for the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS