Taipei's oldest food market at Jiancheng Circle was consigned to history on July 2. A massive reconstruction project to rebuild the market was undertaken after it was damaged by fire in February 1999, at a cost of as much as NT$200 million (US$6.18 million). The result was a cylindrical building of glass that had pretensions of becoming a local landmark -- but totally failed to meet practical needs.
If we examine the Taipei City Government's eight-year urban renewal plan -- from Lungshan Temple's withdrawal from an underground mall project to Shilin Night Market's poor performance since being relocated -- a great amount of government money has been spent without any result.
Taipei is inferior to major cities in neighboring countries in terms of traffic management, quality of goods, discounts for shopping and the degree of internationalization. The city government is obsessed with the number of visitors who arrive, and often ignores that a substantial improvement in tourism usually comes from an increase in the value offered to tourists. It has obliterated the humanity and history of the city, with officials only doing their development planning from inside their offices.
The hawker stalls that made up Jiancheng Circle are part of the city's history. Most of the vendors are still doing good business today in other locations nearby. Evidently, the market's poor performance was not caused by the vendors and consumers. Rather, it was the lack of parking, a poor design that had no clear lines of movement on the first two floors, as well as narrow seating areas and aisles.
Unfortunately, the city government has been unable to face the problems objectively, attempting to turn it into a promotion center for traditional food after all the food vendors left.
Food is a mixture of tradition, culture and even emotions. It cannot be replaced by festivals that look good in appearance only. Blaming the market's failure on the public is irresponsible and immoral. But worse is that the city councilors passed a huge budget and allowed the city government to ignore local residents' petition. They even claimed that the policy mistake was a result of people's outdated dining habits and different historical backgrounds. I strongly hope that the public can see through this political trickery and buck-passing.
We must demand that those councilors who claimed they were concerned about this issue take responsibility and review the failure of the market. They should not show concern only when elect-ions approach, or when vendors, housing prices and the public are already hurt. Such concern is as meaningless as the money wasted on rebuilding the market.
Lo Ying-wei is a project manager for the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS